Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
#76
My Feedback: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
niklawhorn, what was the nature of the crashes? flutter? other? do you know?
ORIGINAL: niklawhorn
The Bearcats are cursed, 3 have gone down at my field in the last couple weeks. 2- on there maiden
The Bearcats are cursed, 3 have gone down at my field in the last couple weeks. 2- on there maiden
#77
My Feedback: (19)
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
ORIGINAL: Richard L.
If you are looking for a larger, great looking Bearcat ARF with scale outline and scale cowl, then wait until this Fall
ORIGINAL: Zippi
Do you know who makes the largest Bearcat or Hellcat in an ARF ?
Do you know who makes the largest Bearcat or Hellcat in an ARF ?
Oriole.
#80
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Garland,
TX
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
Guys! I was looking at this ARF so I would have a fun fly plane I could just put in the truck and go. I'm a gaint scale flyer and have built and flown Ziroli's 98" span Bearcat. At 38 pounds it was a beautiful flier (I sold it and built a Ziroli 98" span Hellcat which I still fly).
This plane (Thunder Tiger Bearcat) worries me, because you can actually twist the tail section without much effort. The strongest parts of any Grumman aircraft should be the under carriage and the tail section. The planes were built to fly well, drop land (on an aircraft carrier) and catch a tail-hook. Even though the Bearcat never went into action, that was the intent of the design. With the clean lines and flying tail surfaces, I would think that a good deal of time would have to be spent beefing up the tail area to prevent the back end from coming apart.
Personally, if I've got to rebuilt an ARF, I may as will build the entire thing my self the right way. Just my personal opion.
Wing Manufacture has a nice pro kit that's 1.20 size, but it has to be built. If you want to stay in that size range.
This plane (Thunder Tiger Bearcat) worries me, because you can actually twist the tail section without much effort. The strongest parts of any Grumman aircraft should be the under carriage and the tail section. The planes were built to fly well, drop land (on an aircraft carrier) and catch a tail-hook. Even though the Bearcat never went into action, that was the intent of the design. With the clean lines and flying tail surfaces, I would think that a good deal of time would have to be spent beefing up the tail area to prevent the back end from coming apart.
Personally, if I've got to rebuilt an ARF, I may as will build the entire thing my self the right way. Just my personal opion.
Wing Manufacture has a nice pro kit that's 1.20 size, but it has to be built. If you want to stay in that size range.
#81
My Feedback: (351)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Las Vegas,
NV
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
I was looking for a Bearcat that I could do a Gulf Hawk version to. I found many plans, Ziroli, Bates and Novack, but I figured for the price I can recover the wings and tail and repaint the Fuse and cowl since everything is already framed up. I saw a Bearcat in the RCU photo gallery of one flying and it looks great with the orange and white colors. I like the scale fighter colors, they just don't show up that well for me in the sky. Besides I was looking for a good winter project and this should be a fun one.
#82
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Victoria,
MN
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
niklawhorn
Got any picts of this>>>???
Yeah didnt you hear?
18 of the new H9 extras wings folded!!!!
5 went down at my field just last week!
and so didn't 3 b25 Bombers from TOpflite!
Err ummmm I don't have any picts or know anything about it!
Funny how that works!
Got any picts of this>>>???
Yeah didnt you hear?
18 of the new H9 extras wings folded!!!!
5 went down at my field just last week!
and so didn't 3 b25 Bombers from TOpflite!
Err ummmm I don't have any picts or know anything about it!
Funny how that works!
#83
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Park,
MD
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
Here's a picture for you, kochj. My Bearcat finally succumbed to the dreaded flutter. The flutter popped the clevis off the elevator servo and it was all downhill from there.
#84
My Feedback: (19)
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
This thread has been doormant for awhile. Anybody out there still flying or assemblying one of these?
Mostly good comments in the past, although concerns about tail flutter were posted. But I think that can be addressed through strenghthening the control rods and using high torque servos.
Just curious how those currently flying are liking this plane.
Cublover... you still flying yours?
Oriole
Mostly good comments in the past, although concerns about tail flutter were posted. But I think that can be addressed through strenghthening the control rods and using high torque servos.
Just curious how those currently flying are liking this plane.
Cublover... you still flying yours?
Oriole
#85
My Feedback: (90)
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
I've still got mine, and it's still not completed. Like many of my R/C projects: it got put on the back burner when more 'important' projects came along.
Here are some pics of the retractable tailwheel and mount that I installed in mine. I think it is actually lighter than the non-retractable tailwheel assembly and mounting hardware.
Here are some pics of the retractable tailwheel and mount that I installed in mine. I think it is actually lighter than the non-retractable tailwheel assembly and mounting hardware.
#88
My Feedback: (283)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
Hi, For all those that are interested in this model. There selling for $249 + $15 for shipping on ebay. There are 5 left. Just search for Thunder Tiger Bearcat. The Item number is 390000882677 the seller ID is hobb-e-ventures.
This is not a reply to anyone, just open info for anyone.
This is not a reply to anyone, just open info for anyone.
#90
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Park,
MD
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
I replaced the wings and tail on mine and it flys better than ever. I used two elevator servos and individual carbon fiber elevator control rods. The last crash happened when I upgraded the power system to use another cell. The stock elevator control rod setup works at speeds below about 90. But anything faster and it self destructs. At least that was my experience.
#92
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Park,
MD
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
Thanks, vasek. I used 30 minute epoxy on the threaded rods. The rods have a pretty tight fit in the CF tubes.
I was contemplating using control horns on the elevators outside the fuselage in the usual fashion. That would probably be the best setup as the current torque rods are not as strong as they should be, they're something like 2mm rods bent at an angle. But so far the setup has worked OK for around a dozen flights with full throttle usage. I'm going easy on the throttle on downwind and dives just to avoid problems.
The model probably does a little over 100 MPH and that's fast enough for me. The 15x12 4 blade prop spinning at 9000 RPM is whisper quiet. And the flutter is instantly recognizable.
I was contemplating using control horns on the elevators outside the fuselage in the usual fashion. That would probably be the best setup as the current torque rods are not as strong as they should be, they're something like 2mm rods bent at an angle. But so far the setup has worked OK for around a dozen flights with full throttle usage. I'm going easy on the throttle on downwind and dives just to avoid problems.
The model probably does a little over 100 MPH and that's fast enough for me. The 15x12 4 blade prop spinning at 9000 RPM is whisper quiet. And the flutter is instantly recognizable.
#93
My Feedback: (90)
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
ORIGINAL: thunder21
Thanks, vasek. I used 30 minute epoxy on the threaded rods. The rods have a pretty tight fit in the CF tubes.
Thanks, vasek. I used 30 minute epoxy on the threaded rods. The rods have a pretty tight fit in the CF tubes.
#94
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College Park,
MD
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
Well, the Bearcat had it's final flight today. The dreaded flutter done her in. I had switched to using two servos for the elevators and upgraded the linkage hardware. So the next weakest link in the chain turned out to the servo tray. The flutter was so severe, the plywood literally disintegrated at the front and rear. The rear was glued in with gorilla glue and it held fast; the top layer of fiberglass actually separated. Then it was all over. With the servo tray broken, the model was uncontrollable and went in pretty hard.
I should have strengthened the servo tray. The way it's designed, the rear gets glued to the fuselage and the front goes all the way to the firewall. If you look close at the damage pics, you can see the plywood of the servo tray is shredded. That's an indication of the vibrational forces at work during the flutter. The elevators are just not designed properly on this model.
I had been careful to ease off the throttle on dives. The flutter occurred on a straight and level downwind pass at full throttle. The model was maybe doing 90MPH. As the model was electric powered and the four blade prop was very quiet, I couldn't miss the flutter. It sounded like a four stroke glow motor for a split second and then went quiet. No more Bearcats for me;-( This is the fourth time I've crashed one due to flutter, and the second model destroyed.
I should have strengthened the servo tray. The way it's designed, the rear gets glued to the fuselage and the front goes all the way to the firewall. If you look close at the damage pics, you can see the plywood of the servo tray is shredded. That's an indication of the vibrational forces at work during the flutter. The elevators are just not designed properly on this model.
I had been careful to ease off the throttle on dives. The flutter occurred on a straight and level downwind pass at full throttle. The model was maybe doing 90MPH. As the model was electric powered and the four blade prop was very quiet, I couldn't miss the flutter. It sounded like a four stroke glow motor for a split second and then went quiet. No more Bearcats for me;-( This is the fourth time I've crashed one due to flutter, and the second model destroyed.
#95
My Feedback: (60)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Litchfield Park,
AZ
Posts: 7,677
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
23 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
Thunder21,
Sorry to hear about the demise of the Bearcat. Next time try the TT Sea Fury instead. I've got one with an OS 1.08 up front and have not had any flutter problems whatsoever. I've never clocked it but I can tell you that it's going penty fast! I love mine.
Chad Veich
Sorry to hear about the demise of the Bearcat. Next time try the TT Sea Fury instead. I've got one with an OS 1.08 up front and have not had any flutter problems whatsoever. I've never clocked it but I can tell you that it's going penty fast! I love mine.
Chad Veich
#96
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Castaic,
CA
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
I just got one cheap at a LHS yesterday. I think I'm going to get a tube of Hysol for one thing. The way Thunder21's plane came apart, it's time to go turbine style in regards to the way the formers and tray go into the fuse.
I think I'll also use the stock H stabs and elevator for basic templates and make my own with scale type hinging and shape of the leading edge of the elevators. Then it will be one big heavy torque rod to do the work.
I have a YS110 just sitting waiting for an airframe, but it's going in the pile for a while till I get some other stuff in the air first. I'm surprised that only Corsair Jock decided to go with the Robart retract tail wheel. With that big open bay to work with back there, it's almost a crime to have a fixed one! I agree that it is lighter as well. I grabbed the tailwheel mount out of the TT kit and compared with the Robart. You can tell just with your hands how much difference there is!
I am not worried with a 13lb+ weight. Heck I used to fly a modified old GP 40 size F4U Arf at 9.5 lb with no flaps! As long as the pilot flys in a scale manner, and respects the airframe design, I bet it's just fine.
I think I'll also use the stock H stabs and elevator for basic templates and make my own with scale type hinging and shape of the leading edge of the elevators. Then it will be one big heavy torque rod to do the work.
I have a YS110 just sitting waiting for an airframe, but it's going in the pile for a while till I get some other stuff in the air first. I'm surprised that only Corsair Jock decided to go with the Robart retract tail wheel. With that big open bay to work with back there, it's almost a crime to have a fixed one! I agree that it is lighter as well. I grabbed the tailwheel mount out of the TT kit and compared with the Robart. You can tell just with your hands how much difference there is!
I am not worried with a 13lb+ weight. Heck I used to fly a modified old GP 40 size F4U Arf at 9.5 lb with no flaps! As long as the pilot flys in a scale manner, and respects the airframe design, I bet it's just fine.
#97
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: doncaster, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
hi anybody still flying these mines had about 9 flights since her maidan two weeks ago. flys ok zenoha 20 with a 17x8 seems best suited though she is no way blessed on power ,weighs just over 14lb.problem im haveing is landing her & not busting the prop, i know the legs are prob not man enough (stock with kit but iin lado tech units) bring her in fast she,s over too slow she drops & over she goes do not seem to be able to find her sweet spot for landing any advise please thanks andy
Read more: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_44...#ixzz0lU3dTOOM
Read more: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_44...#ixzz0lU3dTOOM
#98
My Feedback: (90)
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
I can vouge that there are still some flying: I saw one at a Lexigton, KY warbird event. My own Bearcat never got completed, I still have it ALMOST ready, but no farther along than it was a couple of years ago. I start too many projects, then get side-tracked and don't complete them.
14 lbs it a lot of weight for a plane this size, and bound to cause problems with landing gear.
14 lbs it a lot of weight for a plane this size, and bound to cause problems with landing gear.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Lenox Township, Michigan
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
ORIGINAL: lightning 759
hi anybody still flying these mines had about 9 flights since her maidan two weeks ago. flys ok zenoha 20 with a 17x8 seems best suited though she is no way blessed on power ,weighs just over 14lb.problem im haveing is landing her & not busting the prop, i know the legs are prob not man enough (stock with kit but iin lado tech units) bring her in fast she,s over too slow she drops & over she goes do not seem to be able to find her sweet spot for landing any advise please thanks andy
Read more: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_44...#ixzz0lU3dTOOM
hi anybody still flying these mines had about 9 flights since her maidan two weeks ago. flys ok zenoha 20 with a 17x8 seems best suited though she is no way blessed on power ,weighs just over 14lb.problem im haveing is landing her & not busting the prop, i know the legs are prob not man enough (stock with kit but iin lado tech units) bring her in fast she,s over too slow she drops & over she goes do not seem to be able to find her sweet spot for landing any advise please thanks andy
Read more: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_44...#ixzz0lU3dTOOM
Noseover on landing ? I fly from grass, so one of the things I did to both my Thunder Tiger Rare Bear and my Thunder Tiger F8F Navy version was to kick the landing gear forward so both of the main wheels were about 1 inch (25 MM) farther forward. I did this by fabricating some shims that fit between the landing gear housings and the hardwood landing gear rails. This took care of most the noseover problem when landing.
The pictures are of my F8F Bearcat. 1.60 O.S. FX for power.
I modeled mine after Lt. Commander Roy "Butch" Voris's F8F Bearcat. "Butch" flew the first Blue Angels F6F Hellcat in 1946. Later in 1946 he upgraded to the F8F Bearcat. The Bearcat was the first aircraft to use the U. S. Navys' Blue Angels logo for exibition flying.
I own and fly a lot of scale RC aircraft, but my Bearcat always seems to sit parked in the hanger. I just don't like the way it fly's. Mine has a vicious stall, and it requires a lot of finese and speed to land it. I've tried moving the CG around, but I still don't like the way it fly's. Now she just sits around as a conversation piece.
I was also one of the guys that had my Thunder Tiger Rare Bear destroyed by that dreaded flutter. Anyway, no more Thunder Tiger ARF's for me !! After two of them, I think I've learned my lesson !
Good Luck with yours.
Joe M.
#100
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: doncaster, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: Thunder Tiger F8F Bearcat ARF - Navy Version
hi guys
thanks for the replys think i,m going to mothball her for a while till i make up my mind what to do with her, & rarebear will stay in her box prob for ever wouldnt want to stuff her
thanks guys
andy
thanks for the replys think i,m going to mothball her for a while till i make up my mind what to do with her, & rarebear will stay in her box prob for ever wouldnt want to stuff her
thanks guys
andy