2300?
10-22-2006, 07:07 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: johnstown,
OH
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2300?
how can i tell the difference between a 2300 and a s-120. and by the way ser# is -04571 sold new in june 2005 thru great northern. also is there any info i can get on using the handheld read-out unit? trying to get run time readout /starts etc.
thanks , gerry kerr jr
thanks , gerry kerr jr
10-23-2006, 07:26 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milton,
ON, CANADA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2300?
Hi Gerry
The engine is an S-120, the kit version of the 2300. The silver unit was the last version of the IRDT handheld unit. Handheld will allow you to adjust the max thrust setting(3 points) and the glow power(three levels). It also displays the the current RPM, temperature, battery and pump voltage on the main screen. The second screen shows the ecu version information and total run time on the engine.
Sincerely,
Ed
The engine is an S-120, the kit version of the 2300. The silver unit was the last version of the IRDT handheld unit. Handheld will allow you to adjust the max thrust setting(3 points) and the glow power(three levels). It also displays the the current RPM, temperature, battery and pump voltage on the main screen. The second screen shows the ecu version information and total run time on the engine.
Sincerely,
Ed
10-23-2006, 07:43 PM
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: johnstown,
OH
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2300?
ed, i have one of your invoices for this eng. dated 6/28/05 to adam borz. was this the original sale or the ck-up after build and the turnup of ecu.. ? i have not run yet.eng spins by hand about 3 seconds but i do notice a ever so slight binding spot. could be from sitting so long and sticky residue on bearings, might go away when i run it. ecu says 27 mins. and is version 3.4.1 is this fairly current? and what is expected thrust?[sm=spinnyeyes.gif]
10-24-2006, 06:19 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milton,
ON, CANADA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2300?
Hi Gerry
The date you gave doesn't line up with the computer invoice I have. What is the invoice number?
The binding may be from residue, but you may want to check the inner ring of the blue cover and see if it is contacting in one spot. This was a common issue and is resolved by appyling a little pressure to the blue cover at the contact point to move it outward slightly. The tolerancing is so tight on the inlet that this sometimes happens.
3.4.1 was one of the last software revisions. There may have been one more, but the changes would have been so minor that you couldn't tell the difference. I'd have to dig into my records to see what the engine measured on the test stand, but it should be in the 23-25 lb range. It really depended on whether the person assembling the engine did the extra work required to gain the extra power.
Have fun with it, you won't be disappointed.
Ed
The date you gave doesn't line up with the computer invoice I have. What is the invoice number?
The binding may be from residue, but you may want to check the inner ring of the blue cover and see if it is contacting in one spot. This was a common issue and is resolved by appyling a little pressure to the blue cover at the contact point to move it outward slightly. The tolerancing is so tight on the inlet that this sometimes happens.
3.4.1 was one of the last software revisions. There may have been one more, but the changes would have been so minor that you couldn't tell the difference. I'd have to dig into my records to see what the engine measured on the test stand, but it should be in the 23-25 lb range. It really depended on whether the person assembling the engine did the extra work required to gain the extra power.
Have fun with it, you won't be disappointed.
Ed
ORIGINAL: G.KERR JR.
ed, i have one of your invoices for this eng. dated 6/28/05 to adam borz. was this the original sale or the ck-up after build and the turnup of ecu.. ? i have not run yet.eng spins by hand about 3 seconds but i do notice a ever so slight binding spot. could be from sitting so long and sticky residue on bearings, might go away when i run it. ecu says 27 mins. and is version 3.4.1 is this fairly current? and what is expected thrust?[sm=spinnyeyes.gif]
ed, i have one of your invoices for this eng. dated 6/28/05 to adam borz. was this the original sale or the ck-up after build and the turnup of ecu.. ? i have not run yet.eng spins by hand about 3 seconds but i do notice a ever so slight binding spot. could be from sitting so long and sticky residue on bearings, might go away when i run it. ecu says 27 mins. and is version 3.4.1 is this fairly current? and what is expected thrust?[sm=spinnyeyes.gif]
10-24-2006, 06:46 PM
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: johnstown,
OH
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2300?
INV #062805-1 OBVIOUSLY THE DAYS DATE WAS SHIPPER -SHIP TO INV. FROM YOU TO ADAM BORZ IN READING PA. SAYS RETURNING FROM WARRANTY SERVICE SHP#WA0341CCRWB VALUE $ 2500.00
10-24-2006, 07:20 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milton,
ON, CANADA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2300?
Hi Gerry
That's the customs invoice from when I sent the engine back to him. There was a problem with the glow plug hole alignment and I had to replace the case. Other than that no issues.
Ed
That's the customs invoice from when I sent the engine back to him. There was a problem with the glow plug hole alignment and I had to replace the case. Other than that no issues.
Ed
