balance issues
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Crescent, OK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
balance issues
I have a low wing Lancair ES EP. Instuctions say to place plane upside down on CG 2" fron leading wing edge to balance plane. when i do this and turn plane right side up it is extreamly tail heavy. Am I doing something wrong? Please help I am eager to fly this plane but if balance is off I dont want to put it in the dirt on maiden flight.
#2
RE: balance issues
How do you know it is tail heavy if you haven't flown it? My advice would be to follow the instructions to the letter and adjust only after you've flown the plane.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Crescent, OK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: balance issues
I mean that t when i sit it on the ground the tail touches the ground, i dont think a nose wheel should be in the air just sitting there. LOL
#6
RE: balance issues
Make sure that:
1) You are measuring the location of the CG on the top of the wing on both sides of the fuselage. The balance point, located 2" back from the leading edge of the wing, should be measured at the fuselage sides.
2) Your nose landing gear is not placing the nose too high. When supported by the gear, the central line of the fuse should be horizontal or slightly nose-down.
3) The point of contact of the main landing gear is behind the CG location (extended vertically).
Check these threads out:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_94...tm.htm#9458568
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_95...tm.htm#9527315
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_91...tm.htm#9194804
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_86...tm.htm#8611378
Wish you luck!
1) You are measuring the location of the CG on the top of the wing on both sides of the fuselage. The balance point, located 2" back from the leading edge of the wing, should be measured at the fuselage sides.
2) Your nose landing gear is not placing the nose too high. When supported by the gear, the central line of the fuse should be horizontal or slightly nose-down.
3) The point of contact of the main landing gear is behind the CG location (extended vertically).
Check these threads out:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_94...tm.htm#9458568
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_95...tm.htm#9527315
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_91...tm.htm#9194804
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_86...tm.htm#8611378
Wish you luck!
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Crescent, OK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: balance issues
THANKS FOR THE ADVISE AND SORRY TO REPORT WE HAVE DONE ALL THIS. THE ONLY THING I CAN SEE THAT M9IGHT BE IT IS THAT WHEN THE PLANE IS UPSIDE DOWN ON THE CG MACHINE I AM PLACING WEIGHTS ON THE BOTTOM OF THE PLANE AND IT BALANCES PERFECTLY BUT WHEN I INSTALL THE WEIGHT IN THE SAME PLACE INSIDE THE PLANE AND SET IT ON THE WHEELS THE TAIL IMMEDIATELT DROPPS TO THE GROUND. I HAVE CHECKED ALL MEASUREMENTS AND DOUBLE AND TRIPPLE CHECKED. I HAVE NEVER HAD A PLANE DO THIS AND I HAVE BEEN FLYING FOR OVER 20 YRS? ANY OTHER SUGGESTION?
#8
RE: balance issues
As long as you keep the weights at the same distance from the CG when you re-locate them, the balance should remain the same.
As you know, with the location of the CG being in the closest to the tail, the position of the back wheels should avoid that the plane could end up in a nose up attitude, with the tail on the ground and unable to return to level by itself (due to a gust or extreme flaring).
This could happen only if the vertical line coming down from the CG touches the ground behind the wheels for that attitude.
The 0.05MAC distance is a safety factor that places the wheels beyond that critical point.
On the other hand, if that distance between the wheels and the CG is made too big, that will make the take-off rotation of the model around the back wheels too hard on the elevator, when the fuel tank is full and the CG is located toward the nose.
Note that is important to have the horizontal-vertical location of the CG.
Now, for normal horizontal attitude, it is recommended to make the nose to point down about 3 degree, in order to avoid any bouncing tendency during landing.
As you know, with the location of the CG being in the closest to the tail, the position of the back wheels should avoid that the plane could end up in a nose up attitude, with the tail on the ground and unable to return to level by itself (due to a gust or extreme flaring).
This could happen only if the vertical line coming down from the CG touches the ground behind the wheels for that attitude.
The 0.05MAC distance is a safety factor that places the wheels beyond that critical point.
On the other hand, if that distance between the wheels and the CG is made too big, that will make the take-off rotation of the model around the back wheels too hard on the elevator, when the fuel tank is full and the CG is located toward the nose.
Note that is important to have the horizontal-vertical location of the CG.
Now, for normal horizontal attitude, it is recommended to make the nose to point down about 3 degree, in order to avoid any bouncing tendency during landing.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Crescent, OK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: balance issues
Thanks to all who replied, what we found was indeed the mian landing gear attatment point was in front of the cg mark I am attempting to relocate main landing gear or possibly swing them back behind the CG mark to correct problem. I believe this to be a flaw in design but am not a areonautical engineer so??????? thanks for all your help will post how first flight goes as soon as the wimg dies down.
#11
RE: balance issues
You are welcome.
May be replacing the original wires of the main gear for a little longer (in order to keep original height) new pieces that are bent back until the point of contact with the ground is as recommended in the schematics.
Again, best luck!
May be replacing the original wires of the main gear for a little longer (in order to keep original height) new pieces that are bent back until the point of contact with the ground is as recommended in the schematics.
Again, best luck!
#12
RE: balance issues
PM sent.
Also check these RCU member's reviews:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/product_gu...fm?kit_id=3861
Also check these RCU member's reviews:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/product_gu...fm?kit_id=3861