EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: ., VATICAN CITY
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
Hi,
Can I use the Esky 2.4Ghz 6CH Receiver EK2-0426 in a Lama V4 2.4 ghz instead of the stock EK2-0708?
A seller says it would work with any 2.4 Esky transmitter but i'm not that sure.
I've lost two EK2-0708 in one month and I start to think it isn't a reliable receiver.
Thanks for any help.
Can I use the Esky 2.4Ghz 6CH Receiver EK2-0426 in a Lama V4 2.4 ghz instead of the stock EK2-0708?
A seller says it would work with any 2.4 Esky transmitter but i'm not that sure.
I've lost two EK2-0708 in one month and I start to think it isn't a reliable receiver.
Thanks for any help.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HornsbyNEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
Hi,
Can I use the Esky 2.4Ghz 6CH Receiver EK2-0426 in a Lama V4 2.4 ghz instead of the stock EK2-0708?
A seller says it would work with any 2.4 Esky transmitter but i'm not that sure.
I've lost two EK2-0708 in one month and I start to think it isn't a reliable receiver.
Thanks for any help.
Hi,
Can I use the Esky 2.4Ghz 6CH Receiver EK2-0426 in a Lama V4 2.4 ghz instead of the stock EK2-0708?
A seller says it would work with any 2.4 Esky transmitter but i'm not that sure.
I've lost two EK2-0708 in one month and I start to think it isn't a reliable receiver.
Thanks for any help.
What are you doing to those stock 4-channel coax receivers? Seller is correct - a 6Ch coax Rx should work (although I have not tried it)
Peter[sm=shades_smile.gif]
P.S. The closest I've got is binding three 2.4G Rx (a 4-channel coax (Dauphin), a 4-channel non-coax (HBFPv2), and a 6ch coax (Big Lama)) from the same Tx - at different times obviously![sm=wink_smile.gif]
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: athens, GREECE
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
Hi,
Can I use the Esky 2.4Ghz 6CH Receiver EK2-0426
Hi,
Can I use the Esky 2.4Ghz 6CH Receiver EK2-0426
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
in a Lama V4 2.4 ghz
in a Lama V4 2.4 ghz
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
instead of the stock EK2-0708?
instead of the stock EK2-0708?
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
A seller says it would work with any 2.4 Esky transmitter but i'm not that sure.
A seller says it would work with any 2.4 Esky transmitter but i'm not that sure.
If you mean that if you could separate the multifunctional device and fit there the receiver instead of its own then again it should work.
But I think your main problem is that you burn the speed controllers. Mostly out of not lowering throttle at a crash.
So you need a 4in1 (receiver plus 3in1), not just a receiver.
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
I've lost two EK2-0708 in one month and I start to think it isn't a reliable receiver.
Thanks for any help.
I've lost two EK2-0708 in one month and I start to think it isn't a reliable receiver.
Thanks for any help.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: ., VATICAN CITY
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
hi,
now I see: i can't just replace 0708 for 0426 because the latter is only a receiver and i need a 3-in-1, right?.
i didn't fail to cut the motors.
i tried hard but the heli didn't respond at all.
i even turned the radio off.
i couldn't reach the heli because it was on the ceiling, spinning like hell.
i tried to climb a chair, but failed.
suddenly, the 3-in1 unit turned off and the heli crashed to the floor.
since the 1st flight with this heli i notice a certain loss of signal between the radio and the 3-in-1 unit.
i thought i had a bad 3-in-1 unit and that the problem would be fixed when i replaced it for a new one.
i have already replaced it, but the loss of signal persists.
then, the only possible conclusion is that i have a bad radio, right?
is there something that i could do to fix this radio? what is the part of it that is more likely to have a problem?
thanks.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: athens, GREECE
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
Hi,
Yes, you need a 4in1. Which is a 3in1 + receiver-> 4in1.
Now you have burnt the speed controller out of this 4in1 (EK2-0708). So it`s useless.
But as you say you have burnt the speed controllers out of loosing control of the helicopter.
Hmm, that may be caused by several factors.
One is loosing signal.
When signal is lost then it runs for a few seconds then stop powering the motors, except if the speed controllers are burnt and so they power the motors at max throttle even if the signal is lost.
The other is a mechanical problem.
Another problem could be a glitch problem. A servo may mulfunction (if it is faulty), the radio (transmitter)may mulfunction (if it is faulty). Normally there is not any glitch.
Before you install a new 4in1 then test motors if they work OK. They should not have a smell, they should spin right by spinning the corresponding shaft by hand, and they should run OK (you can test them but it is a bit difficult to describe you right now).
You should never install a new 4in1 if you are not 100% sure that motors are OK. Cause the 4in1 may get damaged out of damaged (short circuit) motors.
After you install the new 4in1 and bind it to the transmitter you have then:
a) install some fresh AA batteries to the trasmitter.
b) lower the throttle trim at the lowest point. Most propably you have lost control out of this. Even if it is set at a low setting then it is enough to get it going up...
c) test if the servo move to the right point. Your new 4in1 may work different and so you have to reverse the servo action through the trasmitter dip switches.
d) test if the rotors spin to the right direction. The upper should spin counter clockwise and the lower clockwise.
Then before a test flight you should test the signal. Take it far away, about 20 meters or more, and just see if the servo work.
Then apply a bit of throttle, but just a little and for too little period, so it does not lift.
I hope it helps.
Yes, you need a 4in1. Which is a 3in1 + receiver-> 4in1.
Now you have burnt the speed controller out of this 4in1 (EK2-0708). So it`s useless.
But as you say you have burnt the speed controllers out of loosing control of the helicopter.
Hmm, that may be caused by several factors.
One is loosing signal.
When signal is lost then it runs for a few seconds then stop powering the motors, except if the speed controllers are burnt and so they power the motors at max throttle even if the signal is lost.
The other is a mechanical problem.
Another problem could be a glitch problem. A servo may mulfunction (if it is faulty), the radio (transmitter)may mulfunction (if it is faulty). Normally there is not any glitch.
Before you install a new 4in1 then test motors if they work OK. They should not have a smell, they should spin right by spinning the corresponding shaft by hand, and they should run OK (you can test them but it is a bit difficult to describe you right now).
You should never install a new 4in1 if you are not 100% sure that motors are OK. Cause the 4in1 may get damaged out of damaged (short circuit) motors.
After you install the new 4in1 and bind it to the transmitter you have then:
a) install some fresh AA batteries to the trasmitter.
b) lower the throttle trim at the lowest point. Most propably you have lost control out of this. Even if it is set at a low setting then it is enough to get it going up...
c) test if the servo move to the right point. Your new 4in1 may work different and so you have to reverse the servo action through the trasmitter dip switches.
d) test if the rotors spin to the right direction. The upper should spin counter clockwise and the lower clockwise.
Then before a test flight you should test the signal. Take it far away, about 20 meters or more, and just see if the servo work.
Then apply a bit of throttle, but just a little and for too little period, so it does not lift.
I hope it helps.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: ., VATICAN CITY
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
hi,
since day one I've been noticing this loss of signal thing.
because I have a cx3, I know how to differentiate a normal situation from a problem.
the heli sometimes kept going up even when i had already stopped throttling up, but so far I had always been able to regain control.
yesterday, before the crash, i noticed that the 3in1 sort of "restarted" between the bind and the take off.
also yesterday, before the crash, I replaced the 3in1 unit.
I also replaced the stock motors for xtreme 180 because I couldn't get off the ground more than 1 feet.
i was told i could have worn out the motors and the new ones really made a huge difference.
i wonder if this problem may have been cause by those xtreme motors but i doubt it because, as i have already said, the loss of signal happens since day one.
i have already tested the motors and they work good.
there's no smell.
as to the servos, i never noticed anything uncommon.
to me, they work great.
however, there's a real and expensive problem definitely.
i just don't know how to fix it.
i'm pretty sure the throttle trim was at the lowest point. actually, i don't know what it is for, since it must always remain in this position.
thanks a lot.
since day one I've been noticing this loss of signal thing.
because I have a cx3, I know how to differentiate a normal situation from a problem.
the heli sometimes kept going up even when i had already stopped throttling up, but so far I had always been able to regain control.
yesterday, before the crash, i noticed that the 3in1 sort of "restarted" between the bind and the take off.
also yesterday, before the crash, I replaced the 3in1 unit.
I also replaced the stock motors for xtreme 180 because I couldn't get off the ground more than 1 feet.
i was told i could have worn out the motors and the new ones really made a huge difference.
i wonder if this problem may have been cause by those xtreme motors but i doubt it because, as i have already said, the loss of signal happens since day one.
i have already tested the motors and they work good.
there's no smell.
as to the servos, i never noticed anything uncommon.
to me, they work great.
however, there's a real and expensive problem definitely.
i just don't know how to fix it.
b) lower the throttle trim at the lowest point. Most probably you have lost control out of this. Even if it is set at a low setting then it is enough to get it going up...
thanks a lot.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: athens, GREECE
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
Hi ReadyToGo,
Then you can test the new 4in1 along with your transmitter by removing all the blades and the flybar and leave it as far as you can.
Then apply just a little throttle and leave it there for some minutes. It should spin at a fixed speed, no hickups.
You can also have someone to see if the servo move while you make the corresponding action.
If it pass this test then it is OK.
You can also use Over-Current protection / Reset-able Fuse for 180 motors (2 pcs) so to protect the new 4in1 (and the motors).
Spiros
Then you can test the new 4in1 along with your transmitter by removing all the blades and the flybar and leave it as far as you can.
Then apply just a little throttle and leave it there for some minutes. It should spin at a fixed speed, no hickups.
You can also have someone to see if the servo move while you make the corresponding action.
If it pass this test then it is OK.
You can also use Over-Current protection / Reset-able Fuse for 180 motors (2 pcs) so to protect the new 4in1 (and the motors).
Spiros
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HornsbyNEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
ORIGINAL: aircrash
Hi ReadyToGo,
Then you can test the new 4in1 along with your transmitter by removing all the blades and the flybar and leave it as far as you can.
Then apply just a little throttle and leave it there for some minutes. It should spin at a fixed speed, no hickups.
You can also have someone to see if the servo move while you make the corresponding action.
If it pass this test then it is OK.
You can also use http://Over-Current protection /Rese...for 180 motors (2 pcs) so to protect the new 4in1 (and the motors).
Hi ReadyToGo,
Then you can test the new 4in1 along with your transmitter by removing all the blades and the flybar and leave it as far as you can.
Then apply just a little throttle and leave it there for some minutes. It should spin at a fixed speed, no hickups.
You can also have someone to see if the servo move while you make the corresponding action.
If it pass this test then it is OK.
You can also use http://Over-Current protection /Rese...for 180 motors (2 pcs) so to protect the new 4in1 (and the motors).
I agree that putting a couple of those inline fuses is a great idea! USHobbySupply.com might be closer for you to purchase them. They will save you buying another 4in1.......
I still believe your prob to be within your Transmitter. Do you have a friend's or a LHS Esky Tx that you can use to bind it? This would eliminate the Tx as the culprit![sm=49_49.gif]
Peter[sm=shades_smile.gif]
P.S. [link=https://www.ushobbysupply.com/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=fuse&osCsid=d56560d86491b2ef82444ff989ac7a8b&x=3&y=7]Over-protection fuses (USHobbySupply.com)[/link]
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: ., VATICAN CITY
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
thank you all.
i've just realized that the esky binding procedure is the reverse of eflite.
i'm supposed to turn on the 4in1 unit before powering the radio.
the lama manual is a mess, written in horrible english and it's impossible to be sure about anything.
they say conflicting things all the time, but they clearly say :
power on the transmitter, indicator twinkles 50timeswithin 3 seconds of binding period, the indicator get solid after the binding. (please note that in the process of binding, first connect the 4 in 1 mix controller before powering on the transmitter)
the second sentence says that i must turn on the 4in1 firstly!
i was doing the very opposite.
i tried it a few times with my partially functional 4in1, and it works.
can this be the reason for a loss of signal during the flight?
I mean, can a "bad bind", caused by an incorrect bind procedure, be the reason for this signal issue?
thanks.
i've just realized that the esky binding procedure is the reverse of eflite.
i'm supposed to turn on the 4in1 unit before powering the radio.
the lama manual is a mess, written in horrible english and it's impossible to be sure about anything.
they say conflicting things all the time, but they clearly say :
power on the transmitter, indicator twinkles 50timeswithin 3 seconds of binding period, the indicator get solid after the binding. (please note that in the process of binding, first connect the 4 in 1 mix controller before powering on the transmitter)
the second sentence says that i must turn on the 4in1 firstly!
i was doing the very opposite.
i tried it a few times with my partially functional 4in1, and it works.
can this be the reason for a loss of signal during the flight?
I mean, can a "bad bind", caused by an incorrect bind procedure, be the reason for this signal issue?
thanks.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HornsbyNEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: EK2-0426 receiver instead of EK2-0708
ORIGINAL: ReadyToGo
thank you all.
i've just realized that the esky binding procedure is the reverse of eflite.
i'm supposed to turn on the 4in1 unit before powering the radio.[img][/img]
the lama manual is a mess, written in horrible english and it's impossible to be sure about anything.
they say conflicting things all the time, but they clearly say :
power on the transmitter, indicator twinkles 50timeswithin 3 seconds of binding period, the indicator get solid after the binding. (please note that in the process of binding, first connect the 4 in 1 mix controller before powering on the transmitter)
the second sentence says that i must turn on the 4in1 firstly!
i was doing the very opposite.
i tried it a few times with my partially functional 4in1, and it works.
can this be the reason for a loss of signal during the flight?
I mean, can a ''bad bind'', caused by an incorrect bind procedure, be the reason for this signal issue?
thanks.
thank you all.
i've just realized that the esky binding procedure is the reverse of eflite.
i'm supposed to turn on the 4in1 unit before powering the radio.[img][/img]
the lama manual is a mess, written in horrible english and it's impossible to be sure about anything.
they say conflicting things all the time, but they clearly say :
power on the transmitter, indicator twinkles 50timeswithin 3 seconds of binding period, the indicator get solid after the binding. (please note that in the process of binding, first connect the 4 in 1 mix controller before powering on the transmitter)
the second sentence says that i must turn on the 4in1 firstly!
i was doing the very opposite.
i tried it a few times with my partially functional 4in1, and it works.
can this be the reason for a loss of signal during the flight?
I mean, can a ''bad bind'', caused by an incorrect bind procedure, be the reason for this signal issue?
thanks.
Yip. The Esky manual is only good if you speak fluent Chinglish
Unfortunately it is unlikely to be responsible for a signal loss once it has bound fully (in flight)[]
I've never heard of an Esky "bad bind"
Peter[sm=shades_smile.gif]
P.S. Can you visit your LHS with your bird and "try" a different Esky 2.4G Tx?
P.P.S. It is a REALLY good idea to order yourself some [link=https://www.ushobbysupply.com/product_info.php?products_id=519]protection fuses[/link] - I see USHobby is out-of-stock ATM email Michael and ask when he expects more......