Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Giant Scale Aircraft - General
Reload this Page >

Giant Sweet and Low stick

Community
Search
Notices
Giant Scale Aircraft - General Discuss all other giant scale aircraft here.

Giant Sweet and Low stick

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2014, 06:13 PM
  #51  
Twin_Flyer
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Westhampton Beach, NY
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone found plans for this model online other then eBay?

Thanks,
Bill S.
Old 10-21-2014, 06:27 PM
  #52  
Super08
My Feedback: (2)
 
Super08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort McMurray, AB, CANADA
Posts: 4,121
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Laserworks sells the plans as well as the short kit.
Old 10-24-2014, 05:49 PM
  #53  
Twin_Flyer
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Westhampton Beach, NY
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That right, I forgot I had them bookmarked as well!

Lookimg to do my first scratch build and thought a stick would be a good one to do.

have a G38 looking for a home...

Thanks,
Bill S.
Old 10-25-2014, 05:14 AM
  #54  
AmishWarlord
My Feedback: (5)
 
AmishWarlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bill I had a G-45 in mine and it was slow and sluggish in the air. That 18% wing thickness is a drag! On the new one I changed the wing to 15% thickness and will use a 55cc engine.
I'n no fan of overpowering planes to where you could be sitting on the runway, open throttle and pull strait up and have the plane accelerate as it's going strait up like a rocket but I don't like Sig Kadets flying rings around my low wing sport plane in the air either.
Old 10-25-2014, 06:23 AM
  #55  
a70eliminator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: mogadore, OH
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AmishWarlord
Bill I had a G-45 in mine and it was slow and sluggish in the air. That 18% wing thickness is a drag! On the new one I changed the wing to 15% thickness and will use a 55cc engine.
I'n no fan of overpowering planes to where you could be sitting on the runway, open throttle and pull strait up and have the plane accelerate as it's going strait up like a rocket but I don't like Sig Kadets flying rings around my low wing sport plane in the air either.
I'm with ya. I like engines, nothing could be finer than an engine with wings.
Old 10-25-2014, 08:14 AM
  #56  
AmishWarlord
My Feedback: (5)
 
AmishWarlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd be surprised if the plane flew over 50 MPH with the G-45 on it. My friend's one with the OS radial engine was even slower.
Old 10-25-2014, 07:41 PM
  #57  
Twin_Flyer
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Westhampton Beach, NY
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmmm, have to rethink this then. largest engine I have is an SPE 43, but that has a home...

G38's seem to go rather cheap on auction site but the G62 doesn't! must be popular still, or simply got lucky...

Bill S.
Old 10-26-2014, 01:56 AM
  #58  
AmishWarlord
My Feedback: (5)
 
AmishWarlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got to watch the power rating on those old designs. I think the 120" wing span Bud Nosen Cessna 310 calls for two .60's

I guess there was less gravity back then, I seen to recall being able to run faster and jump higher thirty years ago than I can today.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	cessna 310.JPG
Views:	633
Size:	15.4 KB
ID:	2042215  

Last edited by AmishWarlord; 10-26-2014 at 02:12 AM.
Old 10-26-2014, 06:17 PM
  #59  
Twin_Flyer
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Westhampton Beach, NY
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A lot of the old designs also used the Dubro belt drive setup on 60 glow, allowed the engine to swing a much larger prop.

Bill S.
Old 11-08-2014, 07:07 AM
  #60  
AmishWarlord
My Feedback: (5)
 
AmishWarlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Looked up a video on the old belt drive systems. I was shocked to see how a Rossi 60 yanked a 1/3 scale Pitts off the ground.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxNXyDxqBC0#t=234
Old 11-15-2014, 10:39 AM
  #61  
Cobra1
My Feedback: (42)
 
Cobra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My giant Sweet n Low has a G62. It really needs a large engine. That big 88" thick wing needs to be pulled through the sky.
Old 11-15-2014, 01:51 PM
  #62  
AmishWarlord
My Feedback: (5)
 
AmishWarlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I put that fat wing on a diet.
Old 11-09-2015, 06:04 AM
  #63  
blhollo2
My Feedback: (278)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuquay varina, NC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cobra1
My giant Sweet n Low has a G62. It really needs a large engine. That big 88" thick wing needs to be pulled through the sky.
How does it fly with that g62?
Old 11-09-2015, 04:27 PM
  #64  
Cobra1
My Feedback: (42)
 
Cobra1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It is not a rocket ship but flys great. I think it weighs about 22 pounds and does the best flat spin. I don't fly it much anymore. You in the market for one? ��
Old 11-09-2015, 06:16 PM
  #65  
Twin_Flyer
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Westhampton Beach, NY
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like fun and always in the market for a plane but the wallet or distance doesn't always agree with me!

Bill S.

Last edited by Twin_Flyer; 11-09-2015 at 06:19 PM.
Old 11-10-2015, 04:59 AM
  #66  
blhollo2
My Feedback: (278)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuquay varina, NC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cobra1
It is not a rocket ship but flys great. I think it weighs about 22 pounds and does the best flat spin. I don't fly it much anymore. You in the market for one? ��
Well I was asking because I have one that needs an engine and iwanted it to have good power and not just plug it around. I ended up getting a Crrc 50cc 4.9hp engine over a heavy zenoah g62.I wanted it to have unlimited vertical
Old 11-10-2015, 01:03 PM
  #67  
rtn9105
My Feedback: (35)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blhollo2
Well I was asking because I have one that needs an engine and iwanted it to have good power and not just plug it around. I ended up getting a Crrc 50cc 4.9hp engine over a heavy zenoah g62.I wanted it to have unlimited vertical
If unlimited vertical is your goal I think you'll be disappointed with the 50cc engine. My sweet n low weighed around 23lbs and had a FPE 4.2 (69cc) and didn't have unlimited vertical. I think the only way I would've gotten unlimited vertical was with a 100cc twin.
Plus I think you might have problems balancing it with a light engine up front.
Old 11-10-2015, 01:39 PM
  #68  
Super08
My Feedback: (2)
 
Super08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort McMurray, AB, CANADA
Posts: 4,121
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

DA 85 would be the ticket. Designed for 24lb 3D aircraft. On a Sweet n Low it would be insane. The only problem would be extending the gear to fit a 26" prop.
Old 11-10-2015, 06:34 PM
  #69  
blhollo2
My Feedback: (278)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuquay varina, NC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes I thought about that it being light but at 4Lbs not including battery and etc it should be close to 5Lbs on the nose. I thought about a Dle55 as its powerful but lighter than the crrc engine. I have eye balled a DJ70cc engine at milehighrc.com do you think the crrc pro will be too light? and where in the cg for this airplane?





QUOTE=rtn9105;12125347]If unlimited vertical is your goal I think you'll be disappointed with the 50cc engine. My sweet n low weighed around 23lbs and had a FPE 4.2 (69cc) and didn't have unlimited vertical. I think the only way I would've gotten unlimited vertical was with a 100cc twin.
Plus I think you might have problems balancing it with a light engine up front.[/QUOTE]
Old 12-06-2015, 07:51 AM
  #70  
blhollo2
My Feedback: (278)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: fuquay varina, NC
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone know the factory Center of gravity for this sweet and low stick?
Old 12-06-2015, 08:22 AM
  #71  
rtn9105
My Feedback: (35)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know the original factory suggested CG location, I balanced mine with the nose pointing a little downward at 30% of the wing cord to start.

I looked on the CRRC site and they say the 50cc weighs 3.63lbs including the muffler and ignition. The FPE 4.2 I used weighs 5.5lbs all up. Your plane may be built lighter than mine was, put it on a CG stand and see if you can get it to balance.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.