K&B Sportster Club
#401
I think the bronze bushed crank gives a very different feel when turned over. My 20 is old style and felt sluggish when I'd try to flip it when it was new. I needed an electric starter for the first couple of starts. Then as I broke it in it began to feel freer-turning, and the compression also increased (very poor compression when new). Even at the end of a dozen runs, it felt slightly sluggish.
My 28 has not been run yet. It feels completely different..no sluggishness when I turn it over; it has a metal on metal feel with little resistance, though certainly not as smooth as even a plain-bearing OS. I suspect it has the bronze bushing.
I really liked the 20 on the test stand and I'm looking forward to breaking in the 28. Throttling was excellent, noise was quite low with the stock muffler, and you could use practically any prop size you wanted.
Jim
My 28 has not been run yet. It feels completely different..no sluggishness when I turn it over; it has a metal on metal feel with little resistance, though certainly not as smooth as even a plain-bearing OS. I suspect it has the bronze bushing.
I really liked the 20 on the test stand and I'm looking forward to breaking in the 28. Throttling was excellent, noise was quite low with the stock muffler, and you could use practically any prop size you wanted.
Jim
#402
I'd seen a post about a guy using a 12x6 on a .20 with good throttling from 1400rpm to 5800rpm and no overheating. Now that is a lugger! Crazy. My .28 has a tight pinch and a metal on metal feel but the bronze bushing has a superb fit. The .20 was in such bad shape internally I didn't turn it over much. Looking forward to running both though.
#403
I never did it myself, but it is said that you can put a flexible extension on the end of the stock muffler and gain performance. I assume there is a length limit, but the original idea was to route the exhaust down and away from the airframe. Must be some kind of tuning effect.
#404
There was an old Model Builder article years ago that the info about the 12x6 prop came from. Stu Richmond had powered a Simplex old timer, 60 inch span, I think, with that combination.
I worked my way up to a 12x4, which the engine ran just fine. I don't know why you couldn't do the same or better with the 28, but I don't know anyone who's tried it.
Jim
I worked my way up to a 12x4, which the engine ran just fine. I don't know why you couldn't do the same or better with the 28, but I don't know anyone who's tried it.
Jim
#405
I'll put a 12x6 on one of these little buggers and see what happens. Haha.
Heres a few photos of my basketcase .20. It has a spot about 1/4 down from TDC that feels "notchy" as if the piston is catching on a port. But it isn't. If I put the exhaust on the opposite side of "normal" it doesn't catch at all. It feels good other than that one notchy spot - compression is good and piston seal is actually pretty good considering how badly corroded everything was. I'll try to run this engine back in after I get my new Jett broke in and ready to go.
Heres a few photos of my basketcase .20. It has a spot about 1/4 down from TDC that feels "notchy" as if the piston is catching on a port. But it isn't. If I put the exhaust on the opposite side of "normal" it doesn't catch at all. It feels good other than that one notchy spot - compression is good and piston seal is actually pretty good considering how badly corroded everything was. I'll try to run this engine back in after I get my new Jett broke in and ready to go.
#406
I ran my basketcase .20 Sportster today. I treated it to an abbreviated Sportster break-in of about 35-40min and half a quart of fuel. It ran well and idles nicely at 3,400rpm. I'm sure with a bigger prop it will idle lower. I used 5% nitro 25% castor fuel and 8x6 APC prop. After running nearly half a quart of fuel through it I peaked it out on the 8x6 and got 14,600rpm. Richened back to 12,500 and let it run the remaining fuel out. It hand started okay - with more time and getting broke in better I'm sure it will hand start better. So far it seems the previous owner didn't totally destroy it.
#408
Well some people will take apart something just to see what it is like on the inside. Then they either can't or don't want to put it back together again. So maybe nothing was wrong the engine. With the K&B Sportster engines, sometimes the flyers at the field will bully the owner and he switches to some other engine instead. I wound up getting a number of engines from people who fell into that trap before. Where people would tell them the engine is no good, blah blah blah, and they go and buy something else that the others say is better. Of course with the Sportster engines, there are other arguably better engines, but who cares if the engine can do the job OK.
#409
Well some people will take apart something just to see what it is like on the inside. Then they either can't or don't want to put it back together again. So maybe nothing was wrong the engine. With the K&B Sportster engines, sometimes the flyers at the field will bully the owner and he switches to some other engine instead. I wound up getting a number of engines from people who fell into that trap before. Where people would tell them the engine is no good, blah blah blah, and they go and buy something else that the others say is better. Of course with the Sportster engines, there are other arguably better engines, but who cares if the engine can do the job OK.
#411
That could be the case, but even low oil fuel would have left some residue behind. It was bone dry, and even appeared to have saw dust in the crankcase.
#412
It does look pretty nasty in there. Funny it doesn't seem to matter.
Whatever happened, those numbers for an 8x6 are extremely good. You're getting about 1000 rpm better than RC Report got on an 8x6 Zinger with 10% nitro and I think a synth/castor mix.
When I was breaking mine in I found it was extremely stiff at first and very gradually got looser, yet even after many runs it still felt a little bit stiff. So maybe they keep getting a little better over a long period of running, and yours has just had plenty of time to completely break in.
It's amazing this thing will run well on 8 inch to 12 inch props. I don't think a lot of engines can do that.
Whatever happened, those numbers for an 8x6 are extremely good. You're getting about 1000 rpm better than RC Report got on an 8x6 Zinger with 10% nitro and I think a synth/castor mix.
When I was breaking mine in I found it was extremely stiff at first and very gradually got looser, yet even after many runs it still felt a little bit stiff. So maybe they keep getting a little better over a long period of running, and yours has just had plenty of time to completely break in.
It's amazing this thing will run well on 8 inch to 12 inch props. I don't think a lot of engines can do that.
#413
It does look pretty nasty in there. Funny it doesn't seem to matter.
Whatever happened, those numbers for an 8x6 are extremely good. You're getting about 1000 rpm better than RC Report got on an 8x6 Zinger with 10% nitro and I think a synth/castor mix.
When I was breaking mine in I found it was extremely stiff at first and very gradually got looser, yet even after many runs it still felt a little bit stiff. So maybe they keep getting a little better over a long period of running, and yours has just had plenty of time to completely break in.
It's amazing this thing will run well on 8 inch to 12 inch props. I don't think a lot of engines can do that.
Whatever happened, those numbers for an 8x6 are extremely good. You're getting about 1000 rpm better than RC Report got on an 8x6 Zinger with 10% nitro and I think a synth/castor mix.
When I was breaking mine in I found it was extremely stiff at first and very gradually got looser, yet even after many runs it still felt a little bit stiff. So maybe they keep getting a little better over a long period of running, and yours has just had plenty of time to completely break in.
It's amazing this thing will run well on 8 inch to 12 inch props. I don't think a lot of engines can do that.
The pair of .65 Sportsters I have came from the Army RCMAT target planes and neither of those had any pinch at all when new either and the piston seal and compression is stellar in those.
This line of engines really needs to be handled like a 4-cycle. Put a tree limb on one and go at it and the engine won't bat an eye (if it had one).
#414
My Feedback: (90)
That's an early sportster 20. It has the silicon rubber gasket. K&B eliminated them fairly fast and like the 28 it is a precision machined head and case fit like many of the older Enya engines.
As your probably aware by now they do take an inordinate time to really run in and that was a real problem to the instant gratification expected with most of the R/C crowd. Higher then normal oil expectations also didn't sit well in the era of 14 % oil. They really do better with larger props and you should treat them like a 4 stroke engine. They are moderate rpm engines that really do best in the 8/9 range just like a c/L stunt engine from years ago. Treated correctly they are almost indestructible.
As your probably aware by now they do take an inordinate time to really run in and that was a real problem to the instant gratification expected with most of the R/C crowd. Higher then normal oil expectations also didn't sit well in the era of 14 % oil. They really do better with larger props and you should treat them like a 4 stroke engine. They are moderate rpm engines that really do best in the 8/9 range just like a c/L stunt engine from years ago. Treated correctly they are almost indestructible.
#415
I like Sportsters. I only have eleven of them. A guy gave me a 20 Sportster. He was disappointed with its power. The engine is so large for a 20, that he thought it was a 40. Says his trainer flys better now with a 40.
#416
That's an early sportster 20. It has the silicon rubber gasket. K&B eliminated them fairly fast and like the 28 it is a precision machined head and case fit like many of the older Enya engines.
As your probably aware by now they do take an inordinate time to really run in and that was a real problem to the instant gratification expected with most of the R/C crowd. Higher then normal oil expectations also didn't sit well in the era of 14 % oil. They really do better with larger props and you should treat them like a 4 stroke engine. They are moderate rpm engines that really do best in the 8/9 range just like a c/L stunt engine from years ago. Treated correctly they are almost indestructible.
As your probably aware by now they do take an inordinate time to really run in and that was a real problem to the instant gratification expected with most of the R/C crowd. Higher then normal oil expectations also didn't sit well in the era of 14 % oil. They really do better with larger props and you should treat them like a 4 stroke engine. They are moderate rpm engines that really do best in the 8/9 range just like a c/L stunt engine from years ago. Treated correctly they are almost indestructible.
#418
My Feedback: (90)
I figured it was an early one due to the head sealing setup and it's crankshaft is not bronze bushed. It's been dormant for a long time. It will be cared for much better now. 25% oil worked well. I run my .65s around 9.5-10k on 12x6-13x6 props. I'll probably use a 9x4 or so on the .20/.28
actually that might be good for a break in prop on the 20 but you will be amazed at how well they do on a 10/5 when broken in. I routinely run my 28 on an 11/4.5. The engines do well when loaded, trying for high rpm is possible but it really doesn't get you more power if you go over the torque limit of the engine.
The thing to remember is that there is really no hard fast rule on props for any model. It is discouraging to watch a person use only one prop on his model and never try to optimize the performance of the model. But in this case the Sportster is not an engine that you will use to hover or do waterfalls. It is more at home pulling stumps.
actually that might be good for a break in prop on the 20 but you will be amazed at how well they do on a 10/5 when broken in. I routinely run my 28 on an 11/4.5. The engines do well when loaded, trying for high rpm is possible but it really doesn't get you more power if you go over the torque limit of the engine.
The thing to remember is that there is really no hard fast rule on props for any model. It is discouraging to watch a person use only one prop on his model and never try to optimize the performance of the model. But in this case the Sportster is not an engine that you will use to hover or do waterfalls. It is more at home pulling stumps.
#419
I have a .65 sportster which runs very hot. I use Byron 15% nitro +16% synthetic/castor fuel. I usually add 1oz. or so of castor to the gallon jug.I have used a 12/6 and a 11/9 prop with no change.Last week i blew two O.S. #8 plugs. I can have five flights in a row with no problems then it starts going dead stick on me. I must say this engine starts like a charm and idles pretty well. Is less nitro and more oil the secret to lowering the operating temperature. Can I use Klotz Benol if I cannot find Sig castor?
Bob
Bob
#420
I have a .65 sportster which runs very hot. I use Byron 15% nitro +16% synthetic/castor fuel. I usually add 1oz. or so of castor to the gallon jug.I have used a 12/6 and a 11/9 prop with no change.Last week i blew two O.S. #8 plugs. I can have five flights in a row with no problems then it starts going dead stick on me. I must say this engine starts like a charm and idles pretty well. Is less nitro and more oil the secret to lowering the operating temperature. Can I use Klotz Benol if I cannot find Sig castor?
Bob
Bob
Keep your ground rpm limited to 9,000-10,000rpm (several hundred rpm rich of peak) and it should run good. They do not like to spin fast.
If cowled, baffle the cowl so the engine gets adequate cooling. Klotz benol is okay, but regular castor is better. SIG raised their castor price to nearly $40USD/gal. There are several outlets that sell castor for $25/gal or less. S&W fuels (SPLube.com) is around $25/gal. There's another site that sells castor for about $17/gal, but I cannot vouch for it being virgin first pressing (degummed) castor. Some guys have been using it without issue though. http://www.bulkapothecary.com/raw-in...ls/castor-oil/
Hope this helps you.
Last edited by 1QwkSport2.5r; 09-07-2015 at 06:57 PM.
#421
Thanks for your reply.I gathered from reading this thread that low nitro and an at least 20% castor is the key.I can only use a 12" prop due to ground clearance.I may have a problem finding 5% nitro around here but 10% should be no problem.
Bob
Bob
#422
Just add methanol to reduce the nitro to 5%. Make sure you add more castor oil to bring the oil up to at least 20% after adding the methanol. My Merco .61; ASP .91 and 1.08; K&B .40, .60 and .65; and OS .80H all like 5%. All would likely run ok on FAI 0% nitro. Good luck.
Last edited by spaceworm; 09-08-2015 at 07:40 AM. Reason: corrections
#423
I would be inclined to use a 3-blade 12" diameter prop then. If you can find FAI fuel, mix equal parts 10% nitro fuel and FAI fuel to get 5% nitro. You can try 10% if that's all you can find, but you may need to set the needle a bit fatter.
#425
Yep. RC Airboat World forums went down for good. The Admin didn't have the time or money to keep her going. Sad, we airboaters lost a LOT of great build info/logs.
Good news is I have a .20 and .28 sportsters in my drawer. The .20 was run horribly lean and was rusted up pretty good. Cleaned up well and runs good though, the .28 is unrun and possibly destined for a Mojo .25.
Good news is I have a .20 and .28 sportsters in my drawer. The .20 was run horribly lean and was rusted up pretty good. Cleaned up well and runs good though, the .28 is unrun and possibly destined for a Mojo .25.