Community
Search
Notices
Glow Engines Discuss RC glow engines

2stroke vrs. 4stroke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2006, 02:46 PM
  #26  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

I adjust my engines far less than my 2S flying friends who seem to be constantly trying to burn out their engines.
I have little problems adjusting engines also, and have no problemws with either two or four stroke. I think this has a lot to do with experiance. IMO a lot of people switch to four stroke when they get to a certain level of experiance and thus experiance less problems. Some work with both and don't notice a dimes worth of differance. Four strokes do have less problems with fuel tank placement, but that is simply because they have smaller carbs which helps to improve fuel draw.
Old 10-27-2006, 07:20 PM
  #27  
B.L.E.
Senior Member
 
B.L.E.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

The market for 2-strokes tends to worship horsepower and high rpm. Buying decisions are often based on brand X milking 0.1 more horsepower out of a .40 than brand Y does. Because of this, these engines are tuned for all out horsepower even at the expense of tractibility. Who cares about throttle linearity when you bore holes in the sky at full throttle for the entire flight anyway. Put a smaller carb on the engine for better throttle response and tune the porting for lower rpm use and nobody will buy it because it's an underpowered dog, unless it's built with bushing bearings and is sold for under $60 bucks retail, but since it has an air bleed carb so that it can meet that price point, it still does not transition all that well.

Four strokes, on the other hand, are designed to please a market of more experienced flyers who demand excellent throttle transition over maximum horsepower and RPM.

And thus, the stereotypes are reinforced.
Old 10-27-2006, 07:38 PM
  #28  
RVM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

That is an interesting point, and goes to show just how much the marketing department can effect what the engineering department does.


ORIGINAL: B.L.E.

The market for 2-strokes tends to worship horsepower and high rpm. Buying decisions are often based on brand X milking 0.1 more horsepower out of a .40 than brand Y does. Because of this, these engines are tuned for all out horsepower even at the expense of tractibility. Who cares about throttle linearity when you bore holes in the sky at full throttle for the entire flight anyway. Put a smaller carb on the engine for better throttle response and tune the porting for lower rpm use and nobody will buy it because it's an underpowered dog, unless it's built with bushing bearings and is sold for under $60 bucks retail, but since it has an air bleed carb so that it can meet that price point, it still does not transition all that well.

Four strokes, on the other hand, are designed to please a market of more experienced flyers who demand excellent throttle transition over maximum horsepower and RPM.

And thus, the stereotypes are reinforced.
Old 10-27-2006, 09:15 PM
  #29  
rainedave
My Feedback: (1)
 
rainedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

Horizon is very slick in their marketing techniques. Almost every product advertised in their quarterly catalogs is interrelated with the other products being promoted. Everything has the appearance of being selected to work together in a supportive manner. This "selective concept catalog" marketing is totally different from Tower's approach which aims to appear as a "Superstore" that offers every imaginable r/c item on the market. Two very different strategies. They both work well.
Old 10-27-2006, 09:31 PM
  #30  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (102)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

Take the OS LA .65 for example, it bested several of the best engines in the MAN shootout and yet the illusion persists that it is a weak engine. I have one and I love it to the point that I Dieselized it, it turns a 13x8 three blade at 9,200.
Old 10-28-2006, 10:13 AM
  #31  
P-40 DRIVER
Senior Member
 
P-40 DRIVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

The reason I run 4 strokes is I prefer the sound and there is no big muffler to contend with. I also prefer the torque curve and tuning of a four stroke. I really like my Saito's but there is a learning curve as far as tuning them; but once you have that mastered, they are very reliable and make excellent power. Yes, they have they have issues just like anything else ( mufflers falling off, bad bearings etc) , but for the most part, they are Pretty trouble free, at least in my experience.
Old 10-28-2006, 10:37 AM
  #32  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: B.L.E.

The market for 2-strokes tends to worship horsepower and high rpm. Buying decisions are often based on brand X milking 0.1 more horsepower out of a .40 than brand Y does. Because of this, these engines are tuned for all out horsepower even at the expense of tractibility. Who cares about throttle linearity when you bore holes in the sky at full throttle for the entire flight anyway. Put a smaller carb on the engine for better throttle response and tune the porting for lower rpm use and nobody will buy it because it's an underpowered dog, unless it's built with bushing bearings and is sold for under $60 bucks retail, but since it has an air bleed carb so that it can meet that price point, it still does not transition all that well.

Four strokes, on the other hand, are designed to please a market of more experienced flyers who demand excellent throttle transition over maximum horsepower and RPM.

And thus, the stereotypes are reinforced.

--------------


I cuold not have said it better myself. Well put.
Old 10-28-2006, 10:22 PM
  #33  
blw
My Feedback: (3)
 
blw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Opelika, AL
Posts: 9,447
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

It is easy to shoot after run oil into a 4 stroke thru the crankcase vent line.
Old 10-29-2006, 12:57 AM
  #34  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: B.L.E.

The market for 2-strokes tends to worship horsepower and high rpm. Buying decisions are often based on brand X milking 0.1 more horsepower out of a .40 than brand Y does. Because of this, these engines are tuned for all out horsepower even at the expense of tractibility. Who cares about throttle linearity when you bore holes in the sky at full throttle for the entire flight anyway. Put a smaller carb on the engine for better throttle response and tune the porting for lower rpm use and nobody will buy it because it's an underpowered dog, unless it's built with bushing bearings and is sold for under $60 bucks retail, but since it has an air bleed carb so that it can meet that price point, it still does not transition all that well.

Four strokes, on the other hand, are designed to please a market of more experienced flyers who demand excellent throttle transition over maximum horsepower and RPM.

And thus, the stereotypes are reinforced.
There are two strokes that can offer the same throttle response and torque. They are popular in pattern aircraft. The OS 1.4 is the best known, but the Webra 1.6 is gaining ground. But the electronic fuel injection give the OS an edge if the plane is kept light. There seems to be about an equal number of two and four stokes in the upper pattern classes.
Old 01-06-2007, 01:45 AM
  #35  
HONDA4EVER
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: RALEIGH, NC
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

OK 1986 Honda's fourtrax 250R came in the world and people that know about bike's would say to this
day it is the BEST. The 450yzx & 450r are very good!! I have the honda! Powerfull and faster then 250R.
The 250R 246cc & 39hp,But a Airstriker crab & FMF pipe make's it move! I want people understand a 4
stroke is better on mech. front. 2 stroke's are the king of pure QUICK!! The fuel part is just simply this
a 2 stroke burn's much more!! The motor burn's the fuel every 2 time's the piston stroke's & the power-
band is when some of the gas&oil mix is pulled in port's. The port's hold the mix and it's burning! The
new gas inter's! The port of burning gas is that the top and as fast as lightning strike's bomb!! Remember
no cam for timing. The port's in the jug is what time's the 2 stroke,But the gas in the top port is only
burning for 1/256 of a sec. Remember in the powerband it burn's fuel in every stroke(TRUE)! Just say
you're riding at 3400rpm & you pour on the gas and it jump's to 9000 in a spilt sec!! 4 stroke's burn's
gas every 2 stroke only! Now the mech. part of the 2 stroke get a pen & paper. Every time the motor
is running write it down & at 70hrs. or riden hard 55-60hrs. Put a new piston kit in & fine hoem the jug
inside cylinder!! Now every 4 time's,Put 3 piston kit's in,But #4 take whole motor apart! The ring's &
cylinder wear. Clean the inside like you were a Dr.& replace every bearing!! Remember lite cast alum. case. Cleaning all metel shaving's & replacing ALL bearing will save in the long run. A 2
stroke is worth the time & money! You have the KING under your butt!! QUICK and working on the motor
you learn a skill.. Life is all about learning! OK check one everytime them freestlye guy's jump 4 stroke
bike's are NOT under there butt's!! Oh the KING OF QUICK IS! They miss a gear rite before the ramp
pour on the gas it will rocket and a life is safed! I was at a motorcross last March 2 heats. 1 heat all 4
stroke's & 1 KTM 105cc 2 stroke. 2 heat two 2 stroke's in the field. The winner of the final was KTM 105cc
450's of all band's in the field, But the 105cc 2 stroke STROKE them by 1 1/3 lap!! LOVED IT! I know 2
stroke's well 1 each kaw kx80,250 Honda cr250,trx250R and now trx450r, like it,But my 250R was the
one I raced for yrs. Never replaced a motor! The mech. I learned from a old pro!! Older people know the
the way. I'm 35 tooo old to race, But never to ride.....lol
P.S. On the 4 piston kit bore .10!! Every 4 kit bore just .10 Boring singal cylinder motor for HP. DON'T!
The cylinder wall waer's every 215-240hrs .10 bore perfect amount! MIXING THE OIL LEAN! DON'T YOU
DO IT!! 2 stroke synthetics worth the cost put rite amount with 93+actane higher the better! No spark-
knoting, Can crack piston & break ring's. Then resleeving cylinder time! Try to resleeve+1300hrs!


Old 01-06-2007, 05:35 AM
  #36  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: B.L.E.

The market for 2-strokes tends to worship horsepower and high rpm. Buying decisions are often based on brand X milking 0.1 more horsepower out of a .40 than brand Y does. Because of this, these engines are tuned for all out horsepower even at the expense of tractibility. Who cares about throttle linearity when you bore holes in the sky at full throttle for the entire flight anyway. Put a smaller carb on the engine for better throttle response and tune the porting for lower rpm use and nobody will buy it because it's an underpowered dog, unless it's built with bushing bearings and is sold for under $60 bucks retail, but since it has an air bleed carb so that it can meet that price point, it still does not transition all that well.

Four strokes, on the other hand, are designed to please a market of more experienced flyers who demand excellent throttle transition over maximum horsepower and RPM.

And thus, the stereotypes are reinforced.

------------


Boy, you've got that one figured out down to a science. <G>


Ed Cregger
Old 01-06-2007, 08:09 AM
  #37  
B.L.E.
Senior Member
 
B.L.E.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: HONDA4EVER

OK 1986 Honda's fourtrax 250R came in the world and people that know about bike's would say to this
day it is the BEST. The 450yzx & 450r are very good!! I have the honda! Powerfull and faster then 250R.
The 250R 246cc & 39hp,But a Airstriker crab & FMF pipe make's it move! I want people understand a 4
stroke is better on mech. front. 2 stroke's are the king of pure QUICK!! The fuel part is just simply this
a 2 stroke burn's much more!! The motor burn's the fuel every 2 time's the piston stroke's & the power-
band is when some of the gas&oil mix is pulled in port's. The port's hold the mix and it's burning! The
new gas inter's! The port of burning gas is that the top and as fast as lightning strike's bomb!! Remember
no cam for timing. The port's in the jug is what time's the 2 stroke,But the gas in the top port is only
burning for 1/256 of a sec. Remember in the powerband it burn's fuel in every stroke(TRUE)! Just say
you're riding at 3400rpm & you pour on the gas and it jump's to 9000 in a spilt sec!! 4 stroke's burn's
gas every 2 stroke only! Now the mech. part of the 2 stroke get a pen & paper. Every time the motor
is running write it down & at 70hrs. or riden hard 55-60hrs. Put a new piston kit in & fine hoem the jug
inside cylinder!! Now every 4 time's,Put 3 piston kit's in,But #4 take whole motor apart! The ring's &
cylinder wear. Clean the inside like you were a Dr.& replace every bearing!! Remember lite cast alum. case. Cleaning all metel shaving's & replacing ALL bearing will save in the long run. A 2
stroke is worth the time & money! You have the KING under your butt!! QUICK and working on the motor
you learn a skill.. Life is all about learning! OK check one everytime them freestlye guy's jump 4 stroke
bike's are NOT under there butt's!! Oh the KING OF QUICK IS! They miss a gear rite before the ramp
pour on the gas it will rocket and a life is safed! I was at a motorcross last March 2 heats. 1 heat all 4
stroke's & 1 KTM 105cc 2 stroke. 2 heat two 2 stroke's in the field. The winner of the final was KTM 105cc
450's of all band's in the field, But the 105cc 2 stroke STROKE them by 1 1/3 lap!! LOVED IT! I know 2
stroke's well 1 each kaw kx80,250 Honda cr250,trx250R and now trx450r, like it,But my 250R was the
one I raced for yrs. Never replaced a motor! The mech. I learned from a old pro!! Older people know the
the way. I'm 35 tooo old to race, But never to ride.....lol
P.S. On the 4 piston kit bore .10!! Every 4 kit bore just .10 Boring singal cylinder motor for HP. DON'T!
The cylinder wall waer's every 215-240hrs .10 bore perfect amount! MIXING THE OIL LEAN! DON'T YOU
DO IT!! 2 stroke synthetics worth the cost put rite amount with 93+actane higher the better! No spark-
knoting, Can crack piston & break ring's. Then resleeving cylinder time! Try to resleeve+1300hrs!



HONDA4EVER, motocross racing takes a lot of skill and a hiqh degree of athleticism and endurance. An excellent rider on a mediocre bike can lap mediocre riders on the best bikes that money can buy. So, the results that you observed prove very little.
There is a common racer's fallacy, "I only lost because my equipment isn't as good as that of the winner". That's a little like saying that the only reason I can't play guitar as well as my favorite rock star is because I can't afford his guitar.
Old 01-06-2007, 08:43 AM
  #38  
Hobbsy
My Feedback: (102)
 
Hobbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 20,370
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 25 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

.
Old 01-06-2007, 10:47 AM
  #39  
wcmorrison
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Weatherford, TX
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: tonywayne

Great thread! Thanks alot gentlemen for you awesome opinions. But just one thing no ones mentioned yet. What about fuel economy between a 2 and 4 strk?
The four storke should use somewhat less fuel but it would take a year to see any real significant change. So I would not worry about fuel consumption.

Cheers,

Chip
Old 01-06-2007, 11:16 AM
  #40  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: blw

It is easy to shoot after run oil into a 4 stroke thru the crankcase vent line.

---------------


If you say so. I'm lost.


Ed Cregger
Old 01-06-2007, 11:17 AM
  #41  
lucien
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke


ORIGINAL: RVM

From what I've seen, currently, within glow engines, the best 4-strokes have a better power:weight than the best 2-strokes. Also, the fuel consumption can be a little better, and I have found that power is much more "instantaneous" with a 4-stroke than with a 2-stroke. Also, 4-strokes seem to run a lot smoother.
Yeah, I can't quite say I agree that 4-strokes are smoother. I put a .26 surpass on a little plane that I had found in a dumpster once. It ran great but had a little more vibration that my .25 2 stroke that I also ran in that plane for a while. I had a Saito 1.50 in a GP super skybolt for a while. The performance was obscene, but so was the vibration. I'm amazed that plane never came apart with that thing in it. Even with the props balanced to within a gnats hair, all my 4-strokes tended to vibrate a little more than my 2-strokes. I theorize it's the power strokes occuring at half the frequency that does it.

As for noise, 2-strokes have gotten a bad rap, I think, because of the exhausts used on them. Especially gassers, with those little can mufflers on them. May as well run them with open exhaust. But with a good exhaust, they're nice and quiet. My big gasser with the intake and exhaust silencers installed is super quiet even inside the airplane - the prop is about the only thing you can hear with maybe a little whine audible at full throttle.

My all time favorite glow is the OS 1.40 RX which, with the $$$$$ OS pipe is barely audible above the prop noise. It was almost like an electric, well not quite, but very quiet.

I still prefer 2-strokes myself, even for full scale, due to the lower parts count. And, in the 40 to 50hp range, which is where I tend to be, there are no economically viable competitors to the 2-stroke motors as of yet.

In R/C, that's changing since the 4-strokes are getting really good. I still prefer the 2-strokes though again for the lower parts count and a little lower cost. I'm jonesin' for another 1.40 RX and a pattern plane already. Who knows when I'll give in....

LS
Old 01-06-2007, 11:43 AM
  #42  
asmund
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Floroe, NORWAY
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2stroke vrs. 4stroke

Just get one You`ll be glad you did

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.