Robart (Ziroli) P-47 "Gabby" version
#102
Hi Rick,
I have to rig the left wing fold system, cut/install gear doors, rehang the engine and reinstall the radio gear. I was well on the way until the Robart v2 Jug came on the horizon. The Jug was supposed to be a "quick build" but of course that notion melted as I started "correcting" parts of the paint scheme I didn't like.
I have to rig the left wing fold system, cut/install gear doors, rehang the engine and reinstall the radio gear. I was well on the way until the Robart v2 Jug came on the horizon. The Jug was supposed to be a "quick build" but of course that notion melted as I started "correcting" parts of the paint scheme I didn't like.
#104
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is the splitter for the bottom of the cowl and when I first saw it I thought it was cool, but for my engine setup it would not work. So I used the one Ziroli sells. I also baffled the inside of the cowl to direct air around the cylinder head. Bear in mind I fly in Las Vegas in the summertime.
I had version 1 as well (until the right wing separated, another story) and using the EVO 80 I'm installing in this one the stock firewall was just fine. I made a wood standoff block and installed the engine with 3" standoffs in both the v1 and now the v2. The EVO 80 is smoother than the DA-85 (I've run both) so I can use standoffs, not recommended with the DA-85.
Referencing propellers, like many, I quickly grew tired of nicking $100 27 X 10 carbon fiber props and moved to a wood Zoar 26 X 12 to give a little more clearance. I had no problem with this setup as the EVO 80 turns a 12" pitch very nicely.
I had version 1 as well (until the right wing separated, another story) and using the EVO 80 I'm installing in this one the stock firewall was just fine. I made a wood standoff block and installed the engine with 3" standoffs in both the v1 and now the v2. The EVO 80 is smoother than the DA-85 (I've run both) so I can use standoffs, not recommended with the DA-85.
Referencing propellers, like many, I quickly grew tired of nicking $100 27 X 10 carbon fiber props and moved to a wood Zoar 26 X 12 to give a little more clearance. I had no problem with this setup as the EVO 80 turns a 12" pitch very nicely.
Hi Greg..
thanks for the info on the ziroli air scoop! do you have pics of the front of the cowling?
sorry to hear about your plane on the carbon wing tube!!
I just got the v2 and in the progress of building..I have the carbon wing tube! Should i worry about it? Should i get aluminum one?I also noticed that you are using a single cylinder 85cc motor..I know they produce more vibraton then your 50 and 60cc motors.
I have seen some 85cc motors share carbon wing tube in half on some 3D planes.
Thanks,Vincent
#105
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am going with the ZP GT80 Twin. It will not fit horizontal,but should fit vertical and the top cylinder is very close to the top of the cowling. I am converting to the 1/4 32 plugs to make more room and should fit. Have to make costume exhaust.
Reason i am going with this motor?
1 one of the smallest motor in its size like 240mm for side to side
2 The plugs have extreme angle for more clearance
3 Its 6.5LB dont like to use a lot of dead weight
4 twins have less vibration
When i am done with the install i will post some pics.
Thanks,Vincent
#106
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vincent,
i used a 3/8 dia hardwood dowel. Also I have no idea what the above scoop is for. Maybe for lower cowl intake?
i have to go in India tomorrow for week and half on business so my building will come to a complete halt. On the 15 hr flight over I sit with a glass or two of wine (read a full bottle) and buy RC stuff. In that way when I get home I have nice presents waiting. The wife just loves it,ha! Maybe I will pull the trigger on the BME 116 for the Meister FW190D I'm building😎
i used a 3/8 dia hardwood dowel. Also I have no idea what the above scoop is for. Maybe for lower cowl intake?
i have to go in India tomorrow for week and half on business so my building will come to a complete halt. On the 15 hr flight over I sit with a glass or two of wine (read a full bottle) and buy RC stuff. In that way when I get home I have nice presents waiting. The wife just loves it,ha! Maybe I will pull the trigger on the BME 116 for the Meister FW190D I'm building😎
Hi Kirk..
Thanks! Have a safe trip to India..Very nice on the Meister FW190!
Thanks,Vincent
#107
My Feedback: (1)
Hi Ed B.
I am going with the ZP GT80 Twin. It will not fit horizontal,but should fit vertical and the top cylinder is very close to the top of the cowling. I am converting to the 1/4 32 plugs to make more room and should fit. Have to make costume exhaust.
Reason i am going with this motor?
1 one of the smallest motor in its size like 240mm for side to side
2 The plugs have extreme angle for more clearance
3 Its 6.5LB dont like to use a lot of dead weight
4 twins have less vibration
When i am done with the install i will post some pics.
Thanks,Vincent
I am going with the ZP GT80 Twin. It will not fit horizontal,but should fit vertical and the top cylinder is very close to the top of the cowling. I am converting to the 1/4 32 plugs to make more room and should fit. Have to make costume exhaust.
Reason i am going with this motor?
1 one of the smallest motor in its size like 240mm for side to side
2 The plugs have extreme angle for more clearance
3 Its 6.5LB dont like to use a lot of dead weight
4 twins have less vibration
When i am done with the install i will post some pics.
Thanks,Vincent
Thanks,
-Ed B.
#108
Hi Greg..
thanks for the info on the ziroli air scoop! do you have pics of the front of the cowling?
sorry to hear about your plane on the carbon wing tube!!
I just got the v2 and in the progress of building..I have the carbon wing tube! Should i worry about it? Should i get aluminum one?I also noticed that you are using a single cylinder 85cc motor..I know they produce more vibraton then your 50 and 60cc motors.
I have seen some 85cc motors share carbon wing tube in half on some 3D planes.
Thanks,Vincent
thanks for the info on the ziroli air scoop! do you have pics of the front of the cowling?
sorry to hear about your plane on the carbon wing tube!!
I just got the v2 and in the progress of building..I have the carbon wing tube! Should i worry about it? Should i get aluminum one?I also noticed that you are using a single cylinder 85cc motor..I know they produce more vibraton then your 50 and 60cc motors.
I have seen some 85cc motors share carbon wing tube in half on some 3D planes.
Thanks,Vincent
Here is the front of the cowl with the Ziroli splitter.
#109
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please DO NOT replace your carbon wing tubes in your v2 Robart. You misinterpreted what I wrote about my v1 Robart. The picture I posted was to compare the wall thickness of the v2 tube verses the thinner wall thickness of the tube I put into the v1. The carbon wing tubes in the v2 Robart Jug are 100% good-to-go and for that matter, the aluminum tube in the v1 Robart is good-to-go as well. I should have never brought this up...
Here is the front of the cowl with the Ziroli splitter.
Here is the front of the cowl with the Ziroli splitter.
Thanks,Vincent
#111
I use a Bonhdus 10 inch extended allen driver in the appropriate size, I bought it from Micro-Fasteners. The cowl bolts up quite easily.
#113
Finally did the maiden sorties on mine this past weekend. Assemble, gas, air and go. No issues at all, it required a couple of trim clicks for elevator and ailerons and was done. Its powered by an EV0/MVVS 80 turning a 26 X 12 prop. I'm more of a scale flyer but I did do a number of max speed runs to check the airframe and rigging out, the EVO 80 with the 12 pitch prop provides a lot of speed. I have a bit of down trim in my flap-elevator system (12X) but otherwise there were no trim changes required when deploying the flaps either half or full. At 41 lb dry weight the model flies light and landings are almost effortless.
#115
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: darwin, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good to hear you had a sucsessful maiden flight, I like you choice of engine as they are a power house at 10hp. I was at you club last year when on a trip to Vegas, nice wide runway.
#121
My Feedback: (3)
The pictures show the demise of a new Robart P 47 ARF on its second flight. I was beginning to disassemble my warbird to go home when I heard the DA 85 in this plane suddenly go wide open and the sound attracted my attention because it was at high altitude and obviously diving at very high speed. When I got my eyes on it the plane was at about 3-400 feet and coming straight down at the east end of our flying field. I heard the spotter call out to cut the throttle and the pilot answer that he had pulled it back but the plane was not responding. A second later it impacted and parts flew 30 feet in every direction. After I got my plane loaded I drove over to the crash site and was amazed at the impact crater it made. There were very few recognizable equipment parts left. The owner and his helper were of the opinion that when the tail separated from the fuselage (at relatively slow flying speed), the tail dragged the servo tray back stretching the throttle pushrod wide open so it would not be able to throttle back. Without a tail to stabilize it the plane went into a terminal dive dragging the tail by the indestructible carbon fiber pushrods (they were still intact after the crash).
I have never seen a wing crater before but you can see the crushed grass on either side of the main crater. Parts of the wings were some distance from the crash site. I examined the fuselage at the failure point and saw very thin fiber glass with no internal reinforcement. 35 years ago I experienced a similar fuselage failure in a popular ducted fan jet on the third flight during a slow pass to take pictures. The right flying stab suddenly fluttered and the plane dove in destroying it. My own evaluation was that the fuselage was laid up in the molds, then the mold was stood on its nose to cure allowing the resin to be pulled by gravity away from the area that failed in flight. I liked that model design and bought 3 more but I installed carbon reinforced parts in the weak area.
I have never seen a wing crater before but you can see the crushed grass on either side of the main crater. Parts of the wings were some distance from the crash site. I examined the fuselage at the failure point and saw very thin fiber glass with no internal reinforcement. 35 years ago I experienced a similar fuselage failure in a popular ducted fan jet on the third flight during a slow pass to take pictures. The right flying stab suddenly fluttered and the plane dove in destroying it. My own evaluation was that the fuselage was laid up in the molds, then the mold was stood on its nose to cure allowing the resin to be pulled by gravity away from the area that failed in flight. I liked that model design and bought 3 more but I installed carbon reinforced parts in the weak area.
#123
Do you guys with hands on experience with this plane, feel a saito fg84r3 would power this plane, I've flown a 36lb esm corsair with this engine and it was matched perfectly
cheers
toby
cheers
toby
#124
Neton, these planes vary in weight with radio gear and landing
Gear so if your around the same
Weight and your saito is in good
Running condition there's no reason there should be a problem
What size prop are you using ?
Gear so if your around the same
Weight and your saito is in good
Running condition there's no reason there should be a problem
What size prop are you using ?
#125
The pictures show the demise of a new Robart P 47 ARF on its second flight. I was beginning to disassemble my warbird to go home when I heard the DA 85 in this plane suddenly go wide open and the sound attracted my attention because it was at high altitude and obviously diving at very high speed. When I got my eyes on it the plane was at about 3-400 feet and coming straight down at the east end of our flying field. I heard the spotter call out to cut the throttle and the pilot answer that he had pulled it back but the plane was not responding. A second later it impacted and parts flew 30 feet in every direction. After I got my plane loaded I drove over to the crash site and was amazed at the impact crater it made. There were very few recognizable equipment parts left. The owner and his helper were of the opinion that when the tail separated from the fuselage (at relatively slow flying speed), the tail dragged the servo tray back stretching the throttle pushrod wide open so it would not be able to throttle back. Without a tail to stabilize it the plane went into a terminal dive dragging the tail by the indestructible carbon fiber pushrods (they were still intact after the crash).
I have never seen a wing crater before but you can see the crushed grass on either side of the main crater. Parts of the wings were some distance from the crash site. I examined the fuselage at the failure point and saw very thin fiber glass with no internal reinforcement. 35 years ago I experienced a similar fuselage failure in a popular ducted fan jet on the third flight during a slow pass to take pictures. The right flying stab suddenly fluttered and the plane dove in destroying it. My own evaluation was that the fuselage was laid up in the molds, then the mold was stood on its nose to cure allowing the resin to be pulled by gravity away from the area that failed in flight. I liked that model design and bought 3 more but I installed carbon reinforced parts in the weak area.
I have never seen a wing crater before but you can see the crushed grass on either side of the main crater. Parts of the wings were some distance from the crash site. I examined the fuselage at the failure point and saw very thin fiber glass with no internal reinforcement. 35 years ago I experienced a similar fuselage failure in a popular ducted fan jet on the third flight during a slow pass to take pictures. The right flying stab suddenly fluttered and the plane dove in destroying it. My own evaluation was that the fuselage was laid up in the molds, then the mold was stood on its nose to cure allowing the resin to be pulled by gravity away from the area that failed in flight. I liked that model design and bought 3 more but I installed carbon reinforced parts in the weak area.
The mishap model sjhanc is talking about looks like a v1 Robart Thunderbolt because of the green wing skins (inside) just like the one in my wreckage photo. Regardless of v1 or v2, I don't know how the throttle could be affected by a tail coming off (if it did) because the throttle servo is mounted to the engine firewall assembly in both variants of the Robart P-47.
Circumstances aside, it is sad to loose a model like this and I feel for the owner/operator.