Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2016, 11:25 AM
  #12726  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Swag

Delete






Last edited by uncljoe; 02-14-2016 at 02:25 PM.
Old 02-14-2016, 03:23 PM
  #12727  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hmmm, let's do another clue.

1. It was an aircraft, albeit an unusual one.
2. Only two prototypes built.
3. Initially, the first prototype had two piston engines, later replaced with a single turboshaft engine. It first flew in 1958.
4. The second prototype had two turboshaft engines, and ejection seats too. It first flew in 1962.
5. The second prototype only had ejection seats for the pilot and co-pilot/gunner. The additional three seats for passengers were not so equipped.
Old 02-14-2016, 03:55 PM
  #12728  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HoundDog
Hey Johnny what Post list's your correct answer Thanks.
Post 12718 had the planes correctly identified but not the connection so I gave it to him. What surprised me is when Ernie guessed the ME-262 which was involved with the Mosquito after two clues so I figured it would go quickly. Guess I was wrong
Ernie's other plane, the 163, was copied by Japan, just like the 262, though they never flew. If I remember correctly, the Japanese also made a rocket powered suicide plane AFTER they received plans for the 163 but it also never flew

Last edited by Hydro Junkie; 02-14-2016 at 04:00 PM.
Old 02-14-2016, 08:42 PM
  #12729  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,705
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

[h=1]Fairey Rotodyne?[/h]Most likely not correct but if it isnt I think we are looking at a rotorcraft.
Old 02-14-2016, 09:16 PM
  #12730  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Elmshoot,

Good catch on the rotorcraft! But not the Fairey, sorry.

1. It was an aircraft, albeit an unusual one.
2. Only two prototypes built.
3. Initially, the first prototype had two piston engines, later replaced with a single turboshaft engine. It first flew in 1958.
4. The second prototype had two turboshaft engines, and ejection seats too. It first flew in 1962.
5. The second prototype only had ejection seats for the pilot and co-pilot/gunner. The additional three seats for passengers were not so equipped.
6. Yes, it's a rotorcraft!
7. It was developed to fulfill a US Army Transportation Research Command contract.
Old 02-15-2016, 08:39 AM
  #12731  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

New clue!

1. It was an aircraft, albeit an unusual one.
2. Only two prototypes built.
3. Initially, the first prototype had two piston engines, later replaced with a single turboshaft engine. It first flew in 1958.
4. The second prototype had two turboshaft engines, and ejection seats too. It first flew in 1962.
5. The second prototype only had ejection seats for the pilot and co-pilot/gunner. The additional three seats for passengers were not so equipped.
6. Yes, it's a rotorcraft!
7. It was developed to fulfill a US Army Transportation Research Command contract.
8. The second prototype was fitted with a powered tricycle undercarriage. This was intended to increase mobility on the ground.
Old 02-16-2016, 06:48 AM
  #12732  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,705
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Blue Thunder keeps coming to mind!
Old 02-16-2016, 01:05 PM
  #12733  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No Roy Scheider!!!

New clue!

1. It was an aircraft, albeit an unusual one.
2. Only two prototypes built.
3. Initially, the first prototype had two piston engines, later replaced with a single turboshaft engine. It first flew in 1958.
4. The second prototype had two turboshaft engines, and ejection seats too. It first flew in 1962.
5. The second prototype only had ejection seats for the pilot and co-pilot/gunner. The additional three seats for passengers were not so equipped.
6. Yes, it's a rotorcraft!
7. It was developed to fulfill a US Army Transportation Research Command contract.
8. The second prototype was fitted with a powered tricycle undercarriage. This was intended to increase mobility on the ground.
9. It had two tandem, three-blade ducted rotors.
Old 02-16-2016, 09:18 PM
  #12734  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyS
No Roy Scheider!!!

New clue!

1. It was an aircraft, albeit an unusual one.
2. Only two prototypes built.
3. Initially, the first prototype had two piston engines, later replaced with a single turboshaft engine. It first flew in 1958.
4. The second prototype had two turboshaft engines, and ejection seats too. It first flew in 1962.
5. The second prototype only had ejection seats for the pilot and co-pilot/gunner. The additional three seats for passengers were not so equipped.
6. Yes, it's a rotorcraft!
7. It was developed to fulfill a US Army Transportation Research Command contract.
8. The second prototype was fitted with a powered tricycle undercarriage. This was intended to increase mobility on the ground.
9. It had two tandem, three-blade ducted rotors.
Well, that should give it away! Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 02-16-2016, 10:32 PM
  #12735  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Doak VZ-4
Old 02-17-2016, 02:25 AM
  #12736  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not the Doak! You're getting closer, however.

New clue!

1. It was an aircraft, albeit an unusual one.
2. Only two prototypes built.
3. Initially, the first prototype had two piston engines, later replaced with a single turboshaft engine. It first flew in 1958.
4. The second prototype had two turboshaft engines, and ejection seats too. It first flew in 1962.
5. The second prototype only had ejection seats for the pilot and co-pilot/gunner. The additional three seats for passengers were not so equipped.
6. Yes, it's a rotorcraft!
7. It was developed to fulfill a US Army Transportation Research Command contract.
8. The second prototype was fitted with a powered tricycle undercarriage. This was intended to increase mobility on the ground.
9. It had two tandem, three-blade ducted rotors.
10. The aircraft was designed for a contract put out by the US Army Transportation Research Command in 1957 for a vehicle that was envisioned to be smaller and easier to fly than a helicopter.
Old 02-17-2016, 08:17 AM
  #12737  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Please tell me you're not looking for that flying platform that could only do 16MPH
Old 02-17-2016, 10:18 AM
  #12738  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Piasecki VZ-8 Airgeep


CB
Old 02-17-2016, 11:45 AM
  #12739  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ding ding ding!!! We have a WINNER!!

The Piasecki VZ-8 Airgeep is what I was looking for. It's a pretty cool device: 85 mph top speed, 3000 feet altitude. Weird looking, though.

CastleBravo: You're up!!
Old 02-17-2016, 11:51 AM
  #12740  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gotcha...This one should go quick...

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"


CB
Old 02-17-2016, 01:05 PM
  #12741  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.


CB
Old 02-17-2016, 01:50 PM
  #12742  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....


CB
Old 02-17-2016, 03:32 PM
  #12743  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded



CB
Old 02-18-2016, 10:12 AM
  #12744  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded
8) On later models...the engine folded too!
9) Clue #2 above refers to an operation...not an ITEM

CB
Old 02-18-2016, 11:34 AM
  #12745  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded
8) On later models...the engine folded too!
9) Clue #2 above refers to an operation...not an ITEM
10) Capacity was up to 6, however the right control column could be removed to enable a stretcher to be transported

CB
Old 02-18-2016, 12:17 PM
  #12746  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

I'm smelling a Sea King or it's predecessor, a UH25B
Old 02-18-2016, 01:03 PM
  #12747  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nope Hydro.....NO Helicopters were harmed in the making of this quiz....nor are there any involved
1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded
8) On later models...the engine folded too!
9) Clue #2 above refers to an operation...not an ITEM
10) Capacity was up to 6, however the right control column could be removed to enable a stretcher to be transported
11) There were 302 of these manufactured. They were given a "generic" name but the conversions were given two different names


CB
Old 02-18-2016, 01:42 PM
  #12748  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded
8) On later models...the engine folded too!
9) Clue #2 above refers to an operation...not an ITEM
10) Capacity was up to 6, however the right control column could be removed to enable a stretcher to be transported
11) There were 302 of these manufactured. They were given a "generic" name but the conversions were given two different names
12) If you were a nuclear weapons fanatic like I am....clues #2 and #9 are significant....because this particular AC was involved and if you watch the declassified documentary...you will see it


CB
Old 02-18-2016, 03:43 PM
  #12749  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded
8) On later models...the engine folded too!
9) Clue #2 above refers to an operation...not an ITEM
10) Capacity was up to 6, however the right control column could be removed to enable a stretcher to be transported
11) There were 302 of these manufactured. They were given a "generic" name but the conversions were given two different names
12) If you were a nuclear weapons fanatic like I am....clues #2 and #9 are significant....because this particular AC was involved and if you watch the declassified documentary...you will see it
13) The AC had a gross weight of 4016 lbs....It could take off in 125 Ft empty....and land in 75 Ft

Last clue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9zg8nFjiw0


CB

Last edited by castlebravo; 02-18-2016 at 03:53 PM.
Old 02-19-2016, 09:15 AM
  #12750  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) Single Engine aircraft....although the type of engine changed
2) "Greenhouse"
3) First flight 1945
4) Was built by a subsidiary of a company that became another company but when everything went to the 4th company...this wasn't included.
5) Wiley Coyote might have gone to "this" company for the engine change
6) But Wiley was no Husky....
7) It had a really big one.....but it folded
8) On later models...the engine folded too!
9) Clue #2 above refers to an operation...not an ITEM
10) Capacity was up to 6, however the right control column could be removed to enable a stretcher to be transported
11) There were 302 of these manufactured. They were given a "generic" name but the conversions were given two different names
12) If you were a nuclear weapons fanatic like I am....clues #2 and #9 are significant....because this particular AC was involved and if you watch the declassified documentary...you will see it
13) The AC had a gross weight of 4016 lbs....It could take off in 125 Ft empty....and land in 75 Ft

Last clue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9zg8nFjiw0

OK....Last...last clue.....go to the 45 min mark in the above video...

CB


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.