Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2015, 06:33 PM
  #12476  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ya...that's what I was thinking...

Might have jumped the gun on the response, further validating my earlier comment that I'm not up to this level yet. Sorry about that.
Old 12-19-2015, 07:59 PM
  #12477  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Actually, a Wright Flyer was the first aircraft, other than balloon, operated by the US military. I guess that would almost make the Wright Flyer a military aircraft prototype
Very Close but no Cigar YET

1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
Old 12-20-2015, 06:56 PM
  #12478  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by porcia83
Ya...that's what I was thinking...

Might have jumped the gun on the response, further validating my earlier comment that I'm not up to this level yet. Sorry about that.
No need to apologize as we all get fooled with these quiz questions. I know I've been wrong far more often than I've been right
Old 12-20-2015, 08:33 PM
  #12479  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Come on I'm Running out of clues

1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
5. built for Specification 486
Old 12-20-2015, 11:04 PM
  #12480  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wright Signal Corps No.1.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	No.1.jpg
Views:	127
Size:	108.8 KB
ID:	2136868  

Last edited by rcguy59; 12-21-2015 at 04:00 AM.
Old 12-21-2015, 03:12 PM
  #12481  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rcguy59
Wright Signal Corps No.1.
Almost but still not the one as I can tell.
need the version

1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
5. built for Specification 486
6.Test flights began 29 June 1909
Old 12-21-2015, 03:22 PM
  #12482  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wright Military Flyer....

CB
Old 12-21-2015, 03:31 PM
  #12483  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by castlebravo
Wright Military Flyer....

need the version

1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
5. built for Specification 486
6.Test flights began 29 June 1909

CB
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 340, align: left"]Looks Like we have a winner
CB U R UP TO BAT.

http://www.wright-brothers.org/Infor..._Airplanes.htm
[/TD]
[TD="width: 250, align: left"][h=5][/h][/TD]
[TD="width: 250, align: left"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 340, align: left"]1909 Military Flyer – Slightly smaller than the Model A, the Wrights sold this aircraft to the United States Army Signal Corp to become the first military aircraft. This was also the first aircraft the Wrights designed for speed – they did so because their contract with the US Department of War specified a minimum speed of 40 mph (64 kph) and granted them a bonus of $2500 for every 1 mph (1.6 kph) over the minimum. The Military Flyer turned in a top speed of 42 mph (68 kph). Once the US military purchased the aircraft, it was used to train the first military pilots.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Old 12-21-2015, 03:34 PM
  #12484  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gotcha!...And I finally have one....

Twin engine AC, WWII era
This variant makes me want to Tip Toe through the Tulips



CB
Old 12-21-2015, 09:00 PM
  #12485  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

PBJ-1J / B-25J-NC. Used to launch the "Tiny Tim" 11.75" rocket.
Old 12-22-2015, 07:56 AM
  #12486  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PBJ-1J / B-25J-NC. Used to launch the "Tiny Tim" 11.75" rocket.


Well....I guess that was too easy...... PBJ-1....Good Job RCGuy!


CB
Old 12-22-2015, 08:04 AM
  #12487  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Let's just say I watched "Laugh In" as a kid...
Old 12-22-2015, 08:06 AM
  #12488  
castlebravo
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You didnt even give me a chance to use my "It reminds me of Peanut Butter and Jelly" clue......




CB
Old 12-22-2015, 08:15 AM
  #12489  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This one shouldn't be too hard, since I'm going to give you a photo of the warbird.

1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.

2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Mystery Plane.jpg
Views:	169
Size:	211.3 KB
ID:	2137019  
Old 12-22-2015, 08:51 AM
  #12490  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Not an A-20, is it?
Old 12-22-2015, 09:20 AM
  #12491  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Not an A-20, is it?
Nope. See #2.

Last edited by rcguy59; 12-22-2015 at 09:36 AM.
Old 12-22-2015, 09:35 AM
  #12492  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by castlebravo
You didnt even give me a chance to use my "It reminds me of Peanut Butter and Jelly" clue......




CB

Sorry 'bout that. I hate to take the fun out of something that's just for fun.
Old 12-22-2015, 09:28 PM
  #12493  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.

2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)

3. It was faster than any American medium bomber, by a useful margin.

4. Two prototypes were built. When the first was turned down as a bomber, the second was evaluated for another role, but crashed.
Old 12-23-2015, 01:46 PM
  #12494  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.

2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)

3. It was faster than any American medium bomber, by a useful margin.

4. Two prototypes were built. When the first was turned down as a bomber, the second was evaluated for another role, but crashed.

5. At the time the first prototype flew, the company that built it was also mass-producing a single-engine fighter. The fighter was the slower of the two.
Old 12-23-2015, 01:59 PM
  #12495  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

XB 28 North American Dragon .... cool airplane ,Too bad the MFG was up to its Air pits in Mustangs
Semper Fi

It was the nose that said North America[HR][/HR]
North American XB-28 Dragon
[HR][/HR]
The XB-28 (North American model NA-63) was originally conceived as a high altitude version of the B-25 medium bomber. The resulting design, while maintaining the same overall configuration of the Mitchell (with the exception of a single vertical tail instead of B-25's twin tail), was visually more reminiscent of the B-26 Marauder. Other differences in the XB-28 design included a pressurized fuselage and three remote-controlled twin .50 caliber gun turrets (upper, lower, and tail). Two prototypes were ordered in February 1940, with the first flight taking place on April 26, 1942. After testing of the two prototypes, the project was canceled with no further examples being built. The reason for this, according to the USAF archives, was that "although the XB-28 was a successful design, the aircraft never went into production. One reason for this was high altitude bombing was too susceptible to errors caused by wind, cloud cover, etc. especially in the Pacific Theater of Operations. Another was the increasing effectiveness of medium bombers at low and medium levels along with improved tactics. Finally, the performance gains were not considered great enough to interrupt production of proven combat models." The second prototype XB-28 was built as a high altitude photo reconnaissance aircraft, and was designated XB-28A, but like the first XB-28 prototype it was the only one of its kind.
[HR][/HR]
Data
Type: high-altitude medium bomber
Crew: 5
Armament: six .50 cal machine guns / up to 4,000 lbs. of bombs

Specifications:
Length: 56' 5"
Height: 14' 0"
Wingspan: 72' 7"
Gross Weight: 35740 lb

Propulsion:
No. of Engines: 2
Powerplant: Pratt & Whitney R-2800 "Double Wasp" radial
Horsepower: 2000 each

Performance:
Range: 2040 miles
Cruise Speed: 255 mph
Max Speed: 372 mph
Ceiling: 33500 ft

Last edited by uncljoe; 12-23-2015 at 02:04 PM.
Old 12-23-2015, 02:38 PM
  #12496  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

We have a winner! The nose glass does look somewhat B-25ish. Not surprising, since the B-28 was based on the B-25. After looking at the specs of comparable U.S. medium bombers, I can't help but think that there is no way in hell the XB-28 was capable of 372 mph in level flight. The Martin B-26 had a top speed of 287 mph and the Douglas A-26 could hit 355 mph. The A-26 was a much more modern design incorporating a laminar-flow wing. All three of these planes used the P&W R-2800 engine.
Old 12-23-2015, 07:09 PM
  #12497  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

The fighter had to be the Allison powered version of the Mustang. When re-engined with the Merlin, the Mustang gained over 40MPH which put it well over 400MPH
Old 12-24-2015, 02:17 AM
  #12498  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Anyone with a question fire away
Semper Fi
Old 12-24-2015, 03:38 AM
  #12499  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

To all a Merry Christmas and to all a good night. You have all added to my personal enjoyment of aviation History, and for that I thank each and every one of you. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 12-24-2015, 08:46 AM
  #12500  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0393.JPG
Views:	215
Size:	37.3 KB
ID:	2137430  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.