Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
Ya...that's what I was thinking...
Might have jumped the gun on the response, further validating my earlier comment that I'm not up to this level yet. Sorry about that.
Might have jumped the gun on the response, further validating my earlier comment that I'm not up to this level yet. Sorry about that.
My Feedback: (49)
1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
No need to apologize as we all get fooled with these quiz questions. I know I've been wrong far more often than I've been right
My Feedback: (49)
Come on I'm Running out of clues
1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
5. built for Specification 486
1. built by brothers
2. fastest for it time
3. awarded $5K for it's extra speed
4. used to train military pilots
5. built for Specification 486
My Feedback: (49)
My Feedback: (49)
[TR]
[TD="width: 340, align: left"]Looks Like we have a winner
CB U R UP TO BAT.
http://www.wright-brothers.org/Infor..._Airplanes.htm
[/TD]
[TD="width: 250, align: left"][h=5][/h][/TD]
[TD="width: 250, align: left"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 340, align: left"]1909 Military Flyer – Slightly smaller than the Model A, the Wrights sold this aircraft to the United States Army Signal Corp to become the first military aircraft. This was also the first aircraft the Wrights designed for speed – they did so because their contract with the US Department of War specified a minimum speed of 40 mph (64 kph) and granted them a bonus of $2500 for every 1 mph (1.6 kph) over the minimum. The Military Flyer turned in a top speed of 42 mph (68 kph). Once the US military purchased the aircraft, it was used to train the first military pilots.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
My Feedback: (8)
This one shouldn't be too hard, since I'm going to give you a photo of the warbird.
1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.
2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)
1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.
2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)
My Feedback: (8)
My Feedback: (8)
1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.
2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)
3. It was faster than any American medium bomber, by a useful margin.
4. Two prototypes were built. When the first was turned down as a bomber, the second was evaluated for another role, but crashed.
2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)
3. It was faster than any American medium bomber, by a useful margin.
4. Two prototypes were built. When the first was turned down as a bomber, the second was evaluated for another role, but crashed.
My Feedback: (8)
1. This warbird was designed to fill a need that never actually arose.
2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)
3. It was faster than any American medium bomber, by a useful margin.
4. Two prototypes were built. When the first was turned down as a bomber, the second was evaluated for another role, but crashed.
5. At the time the first prototype flew, the company that built it was also mass-producing a single-engine fighter. The fighter was the slower of the two.
2. Though it's performance was better than the design it was based on, it wasn't mass-produced. (See #1)
3. It was faster than any American medium bomber, by a useful margin.
4. Two prototypes were built. When the first was turned down as a bomber, the second was evaluated for another role, but crashed.
5. At the time the first prototype flew, the company that built it was also mass-producing a single-engine fighter. The fighter was the slower of the two.
My Feedback: (8)
XB 28 North American Dragon .... cool airplane ,Too bad the MFG was up to its Air pits in Mustangs
Semper Fi
It was the nose that said North America[HR][/HR]
Semper Fi
It was the nose that said North America[HR][/HR]
North American XB-28 Dragon
[HR][/HR]The XB-28 (North American model NA-63) was originally conceived as a high altitude version of the B-25 medium bomber. The resulting design, while maintaining the same overall configuration of the Mitchell (with the exception of a single vertical tail instead of B-25's twin tail), was visually more reminiscent of the B-26 Marauder. Other differences in the XB-28 design included a pressurized fuselage and three remote-controlled twin .50 caliber gun turrets (upper, lower, and tail). Two prototypes were ordered in February 1940, with the first flight taking place on April 26, 1942. After testing of the two prototypes, the project was canceled with no further examples being built. The reason for this, according to the USAF archives, was that "although the XB-28 was a successful design, the aircraft never went into production. One reason for this was high altitude bombing was too susceptible to errors caused by wind, cloud cover, etc. especially in the Pacific Theater of Operations. Another was the increasing effectiveness of medium bombers at low and medium levels along with improved tactics. Finally, the performance gains were not considered great enough to interrupt production of proven combat models." The second prototype XB-28 was built as a high altitude photo reconnaissance aircraft, and was designated XB-28A, but like the first XB-28 prototype it was the only one of its kind.
[HR][/HR]Data
Type: high-altitude medium bomber
Crew: 5
Armament: six .50 cal machine guns / up to 4,000 lbs. of bombs
Specifications:
Length: 56' 5"
Height: 14' 0"
Wingspan: 72' 7"
Gross Weight: 35740 lb
Propulsion:
No. of Engines: 2
Powerplant: Pratt & Whitney R-2800 "Double Wasp" radial
Horsepower: 2000 each
Performance:
Range: 2040 miles
Cruise Speed: 255 mph
Max Speed: 372 mph
Ceiling: 33500 ft
Crew: 5
Armament: six .50 cal machine guns / up to 4,000 lbs. of bombs
Specifications:
Length: 56' 5"
Height: 14' 0"
Wingspan: 72' 7"
Gross Weight: 35740 lb
Propulsion:
No. of Engines: 2
Powerplant: Pratt & Whitney R-2800 "Double Wasp" radial
Horsepower: 2000 each
Performance:
Range: 2040 miles
Cruise Speed: 255 mph
Max Speed: 372 mph
Ceiling: 33500 ft
Last edited by uncljoe; 12-23-2015 at 02:04 PM.
My Feedback: (8)
We have a winner! The nose glass does look somewhat B-25ish. Not surprising, since the B-28 was based on the B-25. After looking at the specs of comparable U.S. medium bombers, I can't help but think that there is no way in hell the XB-28 was capable of 372 mph in level flight. The Martin B-26 had a top speed of 287 mph and the Douglas A-26 could hit 355 mph. The A-26 was a much more modern design incorporating a laminar-flow wing. All three of these planes used the P&W R-2800 engine.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
To all a Merry Christmas and to all a good night. You have all added to my personal enjoyment of aviation History, and for that I thank each and every one of you. Thanks; Ernie P.