Scratch jet design
#4
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Holland Patent,
NY
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nils, I designed a similar scratch built jet several years ago for glow ducted fan. I built several profile sub models to determine the tail angle and area. These were made from thin ( 2-3 mm) balsa and hand launched from my house deck. I determined that a 70 * included angle on the tail worked, ie, glided, the best. Also, made several tails and experimented with the different sizes and areas. The sub-models were scaled up for the flight model which flew very well. It was powered by a Turbax fan unit driven by a Jett 50 DF motor. I'm currently thinking about enlarging it 125% for a 2.5 or 3 m wingspan to be powered by a Wren 44K turbine. Good luck on your project.
Regards,
Art ARRO
Regards,
Art ARRO
#5
Thread Starter
Thanks Art . What do you mean by 70 included angle on the tail ? Is that the V angle ? I have 120 degree on this . I will use my simjet 1200 on it. I have started to build so i can roughly see how it will look , the wings will be balsa sheeted and the whole plane glassed
Last edited by nilsreinert123; 09-18-2018 at 01:00 AM.
#6
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Holland Patent,
NY
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nils,
The included angle is the angle on my jig/fixture to set the incidence of the tail. This is 1/2 of the angle between both tails or 140 degrees. Sorry for any confusion. .There is a direct relationship between the angle and the projected areas of the horizontal and vertical stabilizers. I did a lot of research
and ended up making various tails out of balsa sheet to experiment on my sub-scale models. It worked out just fine.
Regards,
Art ARRO
The included angle is the angle on my jig/fixture to set the incidence of the tail. This is 1/2 of the angle between both tails or 140 degrees. Sorry for any confusion. .There is a direct relationship between the angle and the projected areas of the horizontal and vertical stabilizers. I did a lot of research
and ended up making various tails out of balsa sheet to experiment on my sub-scale models. It worked out just fine.
Regards,
Art ARRO
#8
Thread Starter
Finished covering the wing and parts of fuselage now with epoxy and 22gsm glass cloth. Next will be to paint and install equipment and turbine. I have drawed the canopy on the picture for visual reference. Wonder how this will fly . It will be light , balances ok with the Simjet 1200 in the tail and batteries in front hatch. Also i have some lead in the nose tip. Very exciting project
#12
three fighter jets have a similar profile,except they use a standard tail config...perhaps you should consider the proportions,of the canuck,c100,F104 starfighter,and the Tutor,to get moment correct
#15
Thread Starter
Flew it again today on a frozen lake, it did not crash so it was a success Since last lesson learned i mixed in 5mm up aileron following the elevator and it seem to help on the bad flicking tendencies. But today it was very unstable in pitch ,sensitive on the elevator . I hope i can cure this problem by adding some nose weight..and that i dont have too little tail volume on my plane.
#16
what I see,
I think that you need a larger elevon surface,and a forward balance.
Flew it again today on a frozen lake, it did not crash so it was a success Since last lesson learned i mixed in 5mm up aileron following the elevator and it seem to help on the bad flicking tendencies. But today it was very unstable in pitch ,sensitive on the elevator . I hope i can cure this problem by adding some nose weight..and that i dont have too little tail volume on my plane.