RCU Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: littlecrankshaf

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.05 seconds.

Forum: AMA Discussions

07-04-2009, 01:25 PM

Replies: 83

Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

Views: 8,400

Posted By littlecrankshaf

RE: Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

I don't think the Kid has suggested that it be re-written.

I offered a suggestion and a rationale to consider. Where is your input? Or are you just merely attacking one of the AMA detractors...

Forum: AMA Discussions

07-04-2009, 12:49 AM

Replies: 83

Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

Views: 8,400

Posted By littlecrankshaf

RE: Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

Kid

It seems Red's AMA detractor detector is about as good as his reading and understanding of your position on SC #4 I guess.

Since he is on record as saying he is the oneâ€¦ err...how...

Forum: AMA Discussions

06-19-2009, 09:10 PM

Replies: 83

Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

Views: 8,400

Posted By littlecrankshaf

RE: Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

[sm=thumbup.gif]Enjoyed that very much. Thanks.

Forum: AMA Discussions

06-18-2009, 01:41 PM

Replies: 83

Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

Views: 8,400

Posted By littlecrankshaf

RE: Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

I think he was saying 2lb 60mph models are less likely to harm someone...and I agree if so... and therefore I also agree those light wieght low energy models should be exempt.

We have to...

Forum: AMA Discussions

06-18-2009, 01:08 PM

Replies: 83

Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

Views: 8,400

Posted By littlecrankshaf

RE: Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

I think his point was; all other factors being the same, smaller, lighter models have lower risks than larger, heavier models. How can anyone argue with that?

Reality is, by virtue of nature,...

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5