Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > "1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes
 Smaller than a T.D. >

Smaller than a T.D.

Community
Search
Notices
"1/2 A" & "1/8 A" airplanes These are the small ones...more popular now than ever.

Smaller than a T.D.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2004 | 07:17 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,757
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Bernardino Calif
Default Smaller than a T.D.

Out of an old M.A.N. magazine was an advertisement for glow and diesel engines supposed to be smaller than a T.D. 010 available through an outlet in the U.K.

Just what engines were available commercially that were smaller than the famous Cox engine?



Wm.
Old 06-17-2004 | 05:47 AM
  #2  
gcb
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Port Ewen, NY
Default RE: Smaller than a T.D.

The Bambi .009 predated the Cox .010 by quite a few years.

Others?

George
Old 06-17-2004 | 08:16 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,757
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Bernardino Calif
Default RE: Smaller than a T.D.

Where was the Bambi manufactured? Glow or diesel? Approximate date of sales? Cost then?

The ad which I read is not too specific.


Wm.
Old 06-18-2004 | 06:25 AM
  #4  
gcb
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Port Ewen, NY
Default RE: Smaller than a T.D.

Wm,

The Bambi .009 was a British diesel. I first saw advertisements in model mags in the mid 1950's.
Sorry, don't remember other particulars other than they were hard to start.

George
Old 06-18-2004 | 11:16 AM
  #5  
DesignMan's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cerritos, CA
Default RE: Smaller than a T.D.

I own a Bambi .009, and not only was it hard to start, it had to be modified somewhat before it could be run at all. Quality control was definitely not up to the requirements of an engine that small. Even now it is extremely finicky. I have about 10 minutes of bench time on it, just enogh to verify it really runs. I was driving a C*x 4x2.5 black prop. Probably getting 8 to 9K out of it. Just right for puttering around in a small stick and tissue FF plane.

It was produced originally in England by Albon, then by DC. As a curio it is marvelous, as a useable engine, it is really gutless and VERY expensive.[:'(]

For practical flying, I use a Tee Dee .010 with the C*x 4x2.5 prop mounted backwards. I may have an extra gasket under the head too. The engine is a bit touchy, but not too bad, and flies a 1.5 ounce model without tearing the wings off.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.