engine conversion
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: burneyville, OK
I was just wondering something i was reading the specs on a plane were the motor size was a stock electric 400 and it said or a td.049 will that be about the same power difference wish there was a document that gave electric to glow conversion is there such a document thanks
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
ORIGINAL: layback2
Forget it easyest way to see if its true is to try it i have depends on the weight of the plane thanks
Forget it easyest way to see if its true is to try it i have depends on the weight of the plane thanks
Performance is all about power to weight ratio.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Brunswick,
GA
Greg, that's a pretty neat page. It lays out a simple formula. The average TD puts out about 90 watts with an APC 5.7x3, so figure your power loading from there layback2.
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
It is pretty cool. I had never thought about calculating full size watts per pound until I needed a way to compare performance to engine displacement and get it across to a reader. And when I calculated glow racing engines power output it was amazing. The only thing more impressive was the time I calculated a model turbine engines HP output.
#7
The only thing more impressive was the time I calculated a model turbine engines HP output.
You only ever hear of turbines in terms of thrust. Be interesting to know what they do in HP or Watts.
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
I posted this in another modeling forum in 2004.
----------
The only turbine I have found a complete list of specs for is the JetcatP160. Old these days? Anyhow it makes 160N of thrust statically, while consuming 229kW worth of fuel. They list Efflux velocity as 444m/s. Mass flow at .38 kg/s. Output power(jet power) is quoted as 28kW or 37.5HP. Why wouldn't a turbine aircraft perform? When you have 444m/s efflux, flying at a paltry 89m/s(200MPH) is not a challenge, right? The amount of power available is tremendous.
----------
160 Newtons of thrust is equal to 36Lb. I guess I pulled most of the specs out of a catalog, but we were contemplating how fast we could get an electric ducted fan to fly.
----------
The only turbine I have found a complete list of specs for is the JetcatP160. Old these days? Anyhow it makes 160N of thrust statically, while consuming 229kW worth of fuel. They list Efflux velocity as 444m/s. Mass flow at .38 kg/s. Output power(jet power) is quoted as 28kW or 37.5HP. Why wouldn't a turbine aircraft perform? When you have 444m/s efflux, flying at a paltry 89m/s(200MPH) is not a challenge, right? The amount of power available is tremendous.
----------
160 Newtons of thrust is equal to 36Lb. I guess I pulled most of the specs out of a catalog, but we were contemplating how fast we could get an electric ducted fan to fly.




