ORIGINAL: J Lachowski

I've sat on the side and have not made any comments till now. Myself and the rest of the sequence committee put a lot of time and effort into putting together 5 sequences this time around in accordance to the guidelines which are available on the NSRCA website. We made sure to address peoples concerns about what they saw as deficiencies in the current sequences and the need, as a number of people saw, for a shorter Masters sequence. We went the extra mile and came up with a traditional, as well as, shortened sequence for Masters. We did not have to do it, but there was a lot desire to do so from many. We just put the option out there for people to consider.

The thing that irritates the living heck out of me is that everyone was given a chance to review and even fly these patterns many months ago. At that time we asked for peoples comments and suggestions. At that time we got maybe a handful of comments. There was nothing that suggested we needed to make any adjustments. I believe I even made a post somewhere stating that people should really go out and fly them, as well. I'm not so sure we should entertain any changes at this time since it sets a bad precedence, but...

If anyone has any suggestions for minor changes to the short sequence, foreward them to me at [email protected]. There is no guarantee that any of the suggested changes will be adopted. The NSRCA BOD will have the final say.