RE: Proposed NSRCA sequences for 2011 and beyond
While I respect the efforts of the sequence committee, things like this are exactly why I was against the NSRCA having the sequences removed from the rule book and controlled solely by the NSRCA. I know everyone involved is well-meaning, but if I wasn’t subscribed to the NSRCA list or didn’t check RCU regularly I would have no idea that this was going on. I am aware who the NSRCA district VP is for my region, but keep in mind, he is not MY district VP. He is not bound by anything to even take my opinion into account. He represents the NSRCA members in my region, of which I am not a member. That’s not to say I never have been, or that I never will be again, but the simple fact remains he doesn’t represent me at this time. My recourse should be to people who have no "skin in the game" such as my AMA district VP or contest board members, or anyone else who has the ability to be completely objective.