ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
It looks like I can finally give clear proof of my intentions in answering a question from back when USAMA first hit the scene and I said Wait For Info.
Can you just IMAGINE IF??????????
The AMA started a new program through a 3rd party and:
- information was incomplete on the website
- address of a P.O. Box in Las Vegas that a Google search showed use in the past by known scam companies
- the principal of the 3rd party is linked to fraud inditement when the name is searched on Google
- claims to be using an insurance company that can't be found in Best Ratings
Would the same group of ''just give them time to respond'' posters be giving the AMA time or would they be 'foaming at the mouth'' on the attack?
well, I can now say:
Yes. I did say give USAmA time, and the new data we see from SoS NV is that USAMA might not be completely unrelated to AMA
This could be detrimental to all parties concerned. I remember reading some stuff that was very "flaky" about the USAMA. Man, and all we want are some legitimate competitive orgs out there!
