RCU Forums - View Single Post - Three bladed props vs. two bladed props.
Old 11-27-2010 | 07:36 AM
  #46  
da Rock
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Near Pfafftown NC
Default RE: Three bladed props vs. two bladed props.


ORIGINAL: WarbirdAirRacer


ORIGINAL: Lifer

Trial and error. Eventually you will have a drawer full of props and you can try them on all your engines/airplanes.


sounds expensive! more so when you gotta buy nice carbon fiber props for your 100cc plane. or even a 50cc.

If you study the situation in IMAC for example, where the majority of flyers are using 50cc, 100cc, 150cc, and larger engines, it appears that there are two fairly obvious situations. The range of 3 blade props is huge in the sizes those engines require. The engine retailers have solid experience and knowledge of which of those 3 blades work best on their engines. After all, those engines are expensive, prices go into the thousands of dollars, and not high retail volume items. The prop manufacturers are the same. So you've got two things, decent selection and good advice for matching prop to engine/plane. That results in fewer props in those guys stockpiles.

Compare that to the glow engine guys and the alky burner boys have basically one mfg of 3 blade props and that company advises matchups from the 70s and whose props few LHS keep on hand.... but plenty of $5 to $10 two blade props. It isn't a financial hardship to have a double handful of those 2bladers.