Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to dump on the new, newer and newest vogue in pattern planes, engines etc. Lets compare an Enigma with a DZ 140, Asano pipe and all the goodies ... a total investment of $3000. Put it on a line 140 yards out with a competent pilot and it will fly Masters or FAI just great. Lot of power, constant speed and will use the entire box without blowing out. Scores ... High depending on thumbs at $4 to $5 a flight for fuel.

OK now take a Kaos 60, put an OS or Saito 91 in it, good analogue servos and a top quality setup. Fly it on a line 40 to 50 yards out with a very competent pilot and it will fly Masters or FAI just great. Lots of power, constant speed and will use the entire box without blowing out. Scores ... you tell me what it would have scored at the last contest you attended. Oh yeah, total cost $500 and $.50 per flight.

It's great to say that judges are totally immune to the idea that great pilots fly the newest and best gear and therefore deserve a point or two higher here and there but I don't think that reflects reality.

I'm really not trying to kidnap this thread and turn it into a judging rant. My point is that if you fly pattern for fun and to improve your flying skills it isn't necessary to fly the newest big iron. If your budget is limited or if you have other spending priorities grab one of the older birds and go for it. Even if you end up in the bottom half of the scores in the next contest the scores don't necessarily reflect your flying skills and you will have 95% fun in the process.

Just my .02.