RCU Forums - View Single Post - Ed Kazmirski's Taurus
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2010 | 12:16 PM
  #2181  
kingaltair
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Asheville, NC
Default RE: Ed Kazmurski's Taurus

ORIGINAL: bem

Hi,

Large-scale pattern design around 1965 an prior - is it wingspan You think of?

Is 170-180 cm / 67-71 inch considered ''large'' in this context?

/Bo
Is 170-180 cm / 67-71 inch considered ''large'' in this context? No-larger than 67-71". Ed's Taurus was 70"


Yes to your second figures, I mean 2-meter, (78") or larger. When I talk about "large-scale", I mean something at least as large as the current 2-meter pattern planes or the size of our current FAI models. The Simla was originally 102", (8-1/2 feet or over 2-1/2 meters), later shortened to 96".

It was the first plane I know of to have plug-in wings and adjustable stab, (remember everyone else was holding their wings on with rubber bands back in 1965). Simla was a ground-breaking experimental aircraft way ahead of its time, (and the available engines).

Duane