RCU Forums - View Single Post - Wars over engine starting benches.
View Single Post
Old 12-23-2010 | 03:45 AM
  #63  
Luchnia's Avatar
Luchnia
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Amelia, VA
Default RE: Wars over engine starting benches.


ORIGINAL: Tom Nied

Although the field that I fly at has two of these stands, I still prefer my loop of rope and stake. Just because I like the idea of working on the ground. Not the greatest for this 57 y/o knees, but I feel safer. I don't have to pickup the plane and set it on the ground. Just my opinion.
I sort of prefer the stands myself, but it really depends on what I am flying that day. My smaller planes I like having on a stand. One field I fly at does not even have stands the other has lots of them. The one without stands only has two tables for assembly and such.

I do notice that it is easier on the old body to use the stands [X(] A well designed stand is very nice and accommodating especially for refueling, working with small screws, changing props, radio placement, engine settings, etc. Sometimes it seems a bit safer using the stands, although with larger prop planes you do have to watch taking the plane off the stand and sitting it on the ground.

I suppose there is an argument for both sides of this coin. Having the opportunity to fly with and without stands has allowed me to see the pros and cons of both.