RCU Forums - View Single Post - Turbine cool down - pulsating vs. constant
Old 01-15-2011 | 04:14 PM
  #17  
joeflyer
My Feedback: (49)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
From: Plymouth, MI
Default RE: Turbine cool down - pulsating vs. constant


ORIGINAL: i3dm

Thanks everyone for the help ! it does sound like constant RPM is the best way to go.

does anyone have any idea which constant RPM do most manufacturers use for cool down ?
One thing to keep in mind is that the rpm must be high enough to allow centrifugal force to keep the starter bendix engaged. If your circuit allows you to vary rpm you could conduct some experiments to see what the minimum engagement rpm is. Then you could generate some EGT vs. time cool down curves at various rpms to determine the optimum rpm for your engine. My guess is that you will have to give it a short burst of higher rpm to engage the bendix, then slow it down somewhat to the cooling rpm.

That would be an interesting experiment. Please post your results if you decide to do that.

Joe