Originally posted by aerografixs
If one insists on going to two receivers, then at least go with a system that should a receiver fail for any reason such as batteries, switches and such, you would continue operating on all controls. dual redundency
Roger, I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I though you gave up on the true redundant receiver solution because of the technical issues with signal collision, not being able to sync the two receivers together, and all the bad things that come with that. Did you get them resolved?