ahhh, now we are getting to the meat

So you dont mind my first post, turns out you agree with me.
So lets open the hood on the second post then:

When I say the magazine is not a 'core operation', and that folks should ask Hoss about 'Unrelated Business',
what sources have you checked to learn about AMA's unrelated business ventures.

See, my guess is you havent gotten good data yet
but have formed an opinion on missing or bad data.

How did AMA survive and thrive for so many decades without that 'core'?
Because it actually aint a core, thats how.
AMA was great without the magazine,
so you shouldnt listen to folks that claim AMA is to weak/bad/bankrupt/core-less/etc be great without the magazine.
And to be clear, Optional is not doing away with the magazine, Optional by definition include the option to get it.


Could you use some of them positive posts you claim you want to see,
to show how you see something we tell the feds is Unrelated Business, as being a 'core operation'.