RCU Forums - View Single Post - Does "purpose" determine the required regulations?
Old 06-05-2011 | 04:48 PM
  #96  
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
Silent-AV8R
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Orange County, CA
Default RE: Does


ORIGINAL: JennyJN4

The FAA, NTSB and Federal Courts did not refer to ''business purposes''. They ''consistently defined commercial operation ''.

What part of ''consistently'' indicates only three cases ?

Look, I do not know what to tell you. But we are just chasing our tails here. I am willing to wager you whatever you might choose to wager that the FAA is not going to determine that people engaged in the design, marketing, sales, or distribution of hobby related aircraft and equipment are subject to the non-hobby sections of the coming SFAR Part 107. At this point we need to wait until the need of the year to see what the FAA actually publishes in their NPRM.

But my offer stands to KE. If the FAA does require hobby related people or their non-paid sponsored pilots to comply with the non-hobby portions of the SFAR I will pay for his AMA Life Membership. If it turns out that I am right then I expect him to donate that amount of money to the AMA or to buy his own Life Membership.