ORIGINAL: Johnnie Red
Well it is obvious that kostas1 means glow and not petrol. Here is something that you may don't know. Petrol engines give way more torque. That is the reason he mentioned petrol. That is the reason he is using a 4stroke. From the pics we can all see that he is using an 80 four stroke which is a good choice instead of using ballast to balance to put a bigger engine. Like this he can turn a bigger prop and that doesn't mean neceserilly that he makes it more speedy. He might choose torque instead and definately with his choice will improve landing characteristics, and better response on the tail surfaces.
So if I were in your shoes I wouldn't be fast to judge before I taste.
Happy flyin'
J.R.
P.S. I fly in Greece too, so I would like to inform you that in Greece they have more strict rules than the AMA; since the rules come directly from FAI.
Hi
J.R..
i love your warbirds.....
Back to the topic,
my
FA-80 develops power similar to a
50 size,
modern two stroke (....glow )
Also the weight of my
FA-80 (...fully equipped ) is exactly
540gr.
An
O.S. 46AX is
@ 489gr according to O.S. mfg website. [link=http://www.osengines.com/engines/osmg0547.html]O.S. 46 AX specs[/link] , while an
O.S. 55AX is
@ 404gr.
So,
50gr. on the nose is worthless even to be mentioned.
If you think my combination is way too much for you, just
DON'T FOLLOW MY CHOICES.
I wanted to reply to the topic, because i have a first hand experience....
Which IMO worths more than anything else.....
Regards,
Kostas1