RCU Forums - View Single Post - Pattern weight rule - why?
View Single Post
Old 08-26-2011 | 12:09 PM
  #30  
mjfrederick
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Denham Springs, LA
Default RE: Pattern weight rule - why?


ORIGINAL: jackalope54

Okay - thanks Dave and MattK - your responses are in line with the little I have learned so far - the lighter the wing loading the better. Thought there might be something different with pattern planes given Alejandro's response. And I agree Dave - electrics (and ultimately consumers) pay a HUGE price requiring them to make weight with batteries (their fuel) while IC gets to weigh without fuel.

By the way, I play a lot of golf so I'm fully aware of the foot-dragging a ruling body can show in updating rules but this rule (and its prejudicial application) seems one of those that requires immediate reconsideration.

DLE 55 in a pattern plane??? Sounds like fun!

Jack
The rule is not prejudicial. By definition a battery is a container, not the fuel (look it up in a dictionary if you don't believe me). The fuel is electricity contained within the battery. Luckily for e-flyers that fuel weighs nothing.