The problem lies in the intent and interpretation of the rules. I read the article and the point was made that a person sold a framed up P61 to another, then contested the BOM rule at a later contest. Now, to me there isn't much difference in acquiring a framed up "kit" and "building" a foam and glass bird say from Yellow AC. Or to take it a step further, look at the level of completion of BVM jets.

Also mentioned in the article was the issue of laser cutting. Who cares if the parts are laser cut by a kit cutter or die crunched by a machine? Same difference to me.

Kits and technology as well as skill and ability have greatly evolved since the BOM rule was implemented. So too, the rules must evolve. I would be for exploring cautiously the 51% rule.

.02