Originally posted by Sport_Pilot
I suggest, prior to the Club being dissolved, that you formally advise your *rogues* that if their selection of flying sites causes damage within your selected site (established farmer's field) that legal action for damages will be instituted. Otherwise their choices should be of no concern to you.
So if you are poor, why would you care if you are sued? No money to pay.
Sport-
Right, being judgment proof is one of the few advantages of being poor. "Sue 'em" seems to be Cain's favorite theme these days; must like shelling out shekels to his ambulance chaser. Of course there is no basis for legal action against the 'rogues' in this case, as they have equal rights to use of the FCC allocated frequencies and can fly anywhere they damn well please, unless prohibited by ordinance of recognized authority (that doesn't include Cain, or AMA). Maybe the rogues can get another hungry legal eagle to defend them on contingency, and counter sue for harassment by a frivolous litigant. Then they'll have Cain's big bucks and he'll enjoy being judgment proof.
Abel