RCU Forums - View Single Post - what 2.4 article
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2011 | 03:46 AM
  #27  
Silent-AV8R's Avatar
Silent-AV8R
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Orange County, CA
Default RE: what 2.4 article


ORIGINAL: jester_s1

When I see an independent study done by a group led by someone with at least a Master's degree in electronics or electrical engineering (preferably a doctorate) that shows a flaw in the 2.4 technology, I'll believe it. Some guy Googling a few pieces of information and drawing big conclusions based on logical fallacies (the article) isn't worth the time it took to read it. Read some real research or don't read anything! Sure, our radios are not 100% reliable. They never have been. But the widespread use of 2.4 has shown that it does work and does have some advantages that 72mhz cannot provide.

+1. My thoughts exactly. What is sad is that it appears that Greg Hahn has accepted this article as more than that. Of course, he does not make AMA policy either, the EC does.