RCU Forums - View Single Post - what 2.4 article
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2011 | 05:55 AM
  #30  
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
littlecrankshaf
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: here
Default RE: what 2.4 article


ORIGINAL: Silent-AV8R


ORIGINAL: jester_s1

When I see an independent study done by a group led by someone with at least a Master's degree in electronics or electrical engineering (preferably a doctorate) that shows a flaw in the 2.4 technology, I'll believe it. Some guy Googling a few pieces of information and drawing big conclusions based on logical fallacies (the article) isn't worth the time it took to read it. Read some real research or don't read anything! Sure, our radios are not 100% reliable. They never have been. But the widespread use of 2.4 has shown that it does work and does have some advantages that 72mhz cannot provide.

+1. My thoughts exactly. What is sad is that it appears that Greg Hahn has accepted this article as more than that. Of course, he does not make AMA policy either, the EC does.

But didn't the EC allow Greg to be the TD? I guess as long as he doesn't mow the grass, for an event at Muncie on his day off, everything else is okey dokey...