ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
no GK,
you dont get life insurance in case you get killed by a drunk, while on a bicycle, next to parked cars, on a tuesday, between 6 and 11
you get life insurance
in case you get killed by SOMETHING
(odds are it will be something that kills you)
If you have the responsibility to provide for a family,
then the responsible thing to do is to carry life insurance.
It was YOU that wanted to harsh folks that dont take responsibility (re insurance)
hmmm, lemme just make sure
It is unfortunate there are those who refuse to accept responsibility for their actions thus
yup, there you are disparaging them
...
THEM that dont take responsibility and carry insurance to take care of what they need to pay
Just because YOU want to waffle,
and flip from disparaging folks that refuse to insure to protect strangers
to now defending the guy that 'refuse'd to insure to protect his family,
dont get mad at me for observing your
(using your terms) 'beyond idiotic (or lunatic)' waffleflop on responsibility
Hey! I am in favor of purchasing life insurance. I think you are bringing a very different issue to the table here. Besides, (since you bring it up) were did you find out the victim had no insurance?
It really does not matter. From the legal point of view, the killer will have to do good all the bad he/she caused. It does not matter if the victim (the person this irresponsible life form killed) has or not a family, children, insurance or a condo at the beach. Nothing at all will count. Those are 2 different issues.
So, if you cause a lot of damage, be prepared to correct the bad caused. Since on the average people do not have the money, they are forced to buy insurance to drive the cars. (Granted, with some exceptions, but they are limited to some states)
You do not insure to protect strangers, you insure for the risk YOU run of causing damages to third parties. Obviously, some think that if you damage or kill someone you bear no responsibility, and are not liable. Well, just pray it will never happen to you because you will be hled responsible in a court of law, and you will be liable.
This is such a weird and bizarre argument it is beyond my comprehension. Unless you are deliberately defending the indefensible just to start an argument (by definition being a troll, I think that is the term). If that is the case, touche, well done. If not, have fun:-)
Gerry