RCU Forums - View Single Post - Smallest RIRE engine
View Single Post
Old 12-06-2011 | 11:05 AM
  #15  
HighPlains
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,087
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Over da rainbow, KS
Default RE: Smallest RIRE engine

Front intake Vs rear intake

Simpler maintenance - FI
Easier to cowl cleanly - RI
Smaller crankcase volume - RI
Shorter crankshaft - RI
Smaller diameter crankshaft - RI
Lower internal drag - hmm

More parts a turning, but the bearing balls running slower in the races.

I would imagine the engine designers could add a dozen more considerations to the list. But what if the engine did not have to drive the rear rotor or drum?