RCU Forums - View Single Post - How the "level" the playing field?!
View Single Post
Old 12-27-2011 | 06:07 AM
  #59  
NJRCFLYER2
My Feedback: (42)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Randolph, NJ
Default RE: How the


ORIGINAL: mlr53

At each contest I have attended, I have seen competitors with top of the line planes and equipmentfrom top to bottom, just having the top of the line equipment didn't put them on top. Some wins, some looses. In most cases it's the best pilot. Considering the time and effort I put into my pattern plane triming and working on getting it to fly the best it can, so that I can fly the best I can, I would not compete in a claiming event. If someone claims the plane then what, your out for the rest of the season? That would actually increase the cost of competiting as you would need multiple planes, ready to go in case someone claimed your plane. If you do the research, you will generally find that the guy who spends the most time, triming, practicing, and getting to know his equipment will come out on or near the top pretty often. I firmly believe the effort you put into it makes the difference. I started flying pattern with a Kaos, had fun and took a few trophies (though not a first). Moving to a better pattern plane improved my flying some but I still got beat by guy's with less pricey not so precise planes. Fly what you have, look for a good used plane, and work toward improving your skills and abilities.

This brings up the question, as a judge, do you give better scores to the guy with the top of the line equipmentas compared tosomeone with less quality equipment?
Ans: Heck no. Scoring is done bysubtracting points from each figure based on what the rules say that the prescribed downgrades are for each observed defect. Anyone who does otherwse should disqualify themselves, and offer apologies to every pilot they ever cheated by not following the rules.