ORIGINAL: petec

Then again no one said an competitor needs to use a 2Mx2M airframe at the NATS either, that is a choice. If they CHOOSE to go to the size maximum, then they MIGHT bump up against the weight limit.

Why is there an FAI style spinner? I need one to make length on my plane instead of a longer profile spinner. I think the size rule should be removed as it is archaic and makes me spend money on things I wouldn't have to if it did not exist. That will help breathe life into pattern, right?

Any limitation can be argued as to why it should not be there, but the fact is if you want to compete, especially at the National level, then you will have to comply with the rules. Competition, no matter what venue, costs money. Once you cross the line into competition your cost goes up. I used to race cars and motorcycles, as soon as I crossed the line from just enjoying a high performance vehicle to competing it cost me cash....same vehicle in my first entry level classes was an immediate cost increase just to meet the rules. Argue these rules until you all have carpal tunnel syndrome but those are facts. Change the weight rule if you can get enough support and it will cost the competitor money to use what they PERCEIVE as needed equipment when the game changes to meet the new rule limit. No ifs or mights, nature abhors a vacuum and someone will take advantage of and leeway given.

If pattern is really about the best pilot then you really don't need a 2M airframe do you? I will never be at the top of the Masters class and really don't need a 2M airplane but I have one because I wanted one. I can lose just as well with a smaller airframe.

Ok time to go and get my 5 year old ready for a day of adventure.