ORIGINAL: STKNRUD
From your lips to God's ears. Only time will tell. If you are right, I think the AMA should be able to affirm immediately that there will be no change and no need for further dialog with the FAA.
Well, there's what the law says and then there's the political reality. Even though there appears to be no *requirement* to involve the FAA in the "community standards" according to the law, I believe that we will see the AMA still work with the FAA to get their "buy in" to our standards. I think if we do a 100% about-face when the law is passed and tell the FAA to go pound sand, it would likely make our lives more difficult in the future...
Honestly, I don't think that the FAA has any real desire to regulate us in the first place, but there was a lot of pressure from the sUAS community to include what they see as equivalent operations as "model aircraft" in the rule-making process. This law, if passed, will give the FAA an "out" to basically leave us alone, which I think they would prefer to do in the first place - as long as, as the law says, we don't do anything to "endanger the safety of the national airspace system."
Bob