JohnShe
Not "approved", that is not what I said.The operational guidelines must be "accepted" by the FAA or else the FAA is free to regulate the activity. The law is clear.
It equally does not say 'Approved' nor 'Accepted'
... nor 'submitted, 'reviewed', 'authorized', 'acknowledged', 'considered', 'evaluated', 'confirmed', 'presented' etc etc
There is NO requirement for a cbo to actually DO anything with their cbo documents,
other than just HAVE them and have them be extensive.
CBOs are NOT required to submit their documents to FAA.
CBOs are NOT required to REWRITE their documents prior to them not being required to submit.
There is
no congressional requirement for that in order to get the congressional protection from FAA that the bill creates.
uh.. why is AMA spending so much resources rewriting their documents that they want to recoup the cost???
Congress is protecting us from FAA harassment now
... FAA harassment like FAA requiring cbos to rewrite and submit our documents
Why, with page after page of this being pointed out,
do folks still cling to that fallacy/myth?
I've been saying it over and over,
SilentAv has been saying it over and over,
yet we still see folks clinging to that fallacy.
JohnShe, rather than just asking us to believe you,
could you quote where congress says cbo docs must be given to ANY fed boys,
and highlight the word 'required' in the citation (or its synonym like SHALL or MUST etc)