ORIGINAL: CLRD2LAND
ORIGINAL: gaRCfield
Well this is funny - I registered for NSRCA site so I could do the poll, but it never worked, so I never voted. I would have voted NO on the safety proposal. I would need discussion and some clarification before voting yes.
Hi Joe,
We did have a problem on the ''back-end'' with some survey takers being able to log in and take the survey. At first, we had it locked down to being able to take the survey only once. In order to let these folks take the survey, our webteam opened it open competely so that anyone could go in and take the survey. Those 3 individuals that decided it would be ''funny'' to take the survey multiple times simply had their second through {insert a 2-digit number here} results deleted without looking at the results. These results were deleted based on user id, ip address and time stamps.
Did you have any luck with emailing any of the email addresses for the BoD or the webteam when you couldn't take the survey? I'm sure we would have been able to help you. Secondly, DUE, in part to the results of the survey and discussions here and on the NSRCA Discussion list on Safety, the original Safety Proposal was thrown out and a new one was developed. Did we get the 2nd proposal in the survey? Due to time restraints, we did not. At the time, the major point that was discussed thoroughly here and on the NSRCA Discussion list was the inclusion of the arming plug. Although the survey was 50/50 even at the end, that candidate proposal was still dropped and the one submitted to the AMA was put in it's place. The new one, as you've seen, leaves the option of how in all cases to the competitor. Now, the complaint is different. As you can see from my previous post, we are still working even now to make sure we are doing the right thing. So, with that being said, your ''no'' vote succeeded without submission because the candidate proposal in the survey was removed and although not defeated, subsequently changed. In essense, the point is moot.
<br type=''_moz'' />