You are wanting us to believe YOU already know what regulations on cbo modeling that FAA will write in violation of pl112-95.
This is not true. I have never claimed to know what regulations the FAA will write. What I've done is to try to explain why the law is flexible enough to allow the FAA to write some regulations that we may not like. I've also consistently said that I doubt that the FAA will do that.
Where you got the idea that I have defended the FAA's "being unlawful" I have no idea. I've said repeatedly that I hope the FAA does not do the things I've worried about. Is English not your native language by some chance? (Most native speakers would say "you want us," not "you are wanting us.") Or is claiming that people have said the opposite of what they really said your idea of argument?