wow,
once again BP is helping me prove a point.
I always thought you didnt like me,
but here you are helping me out again right after you demonstrated my point in the Vitriol thread.

Thanx BP, you truly are a friend in need


as for the way you pointed out
how theres nothing wrong with folks (that the rules dont apply to) not obeying the rules,
yeah, you (and I) are right-
When RGB gets mad 'a few bad apples' breaking the rules
the only folks he possible can be talking about are NOT the ones the rules dont apply to
(like non-members and members that choose to exploit loopholes to break the AMA rules)

If he wants to still hold folks like Hill/Brown/non-members to the ama rules
even when we can all clearly see the rules dont apply to them,
then he can expect to have folks like you and me point out how they(Hill/Brown/non-members) dont have to follow AMA rules ... therefore they are not breaking them.

uh... unless RGB expects the president to AMA to follow AMA's rules even when he is not being forced to,
but that is more a matter of character than rule breaking... the classic 'do as we say, not as we do' is not really what this thread is about

So BP
who could RBG possibly be talking about when he refers to folks breaking the rules,
if the rules ONLY apply to ama members (but not AMA presidents that exploit loopholes)?
Who are these AMA Rule breakers?

Seems to me if RBG posted with a lil less name calling,
you and I wouldnt have to point out the guys he's bashing can only be AMA members (except AMA prez across the border)