ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy

I thought I was pretty clear
pointing out how my post was about the Causby situation that someone brought up in this thread.

Thank you Kbob for helping me shoot down their Causby concerns by pointing out
its NOT about the stuff Causby was about,
but that it is about PRIVACY from being spied on invading ones privacy




... in particular, its about being spied on by things that are TOO UNOBTRUSIVE to know you are being spied on
(which, as my post points out, means they must be Too Unobtrusive to be considered for Causby land protections)

Every time some privacy nut says drones are too small and quiet that they spy and catch folks unawares,
the AMA should run up and say "Yeah, they are small and quiet, have been for decades"


No Kbob
just because legal things that you disagree with are happening,
doesnt mean that a SLIGHT variation on them legal things needs to have JUST that slight variation banned.
If you want to stop the govenrnment from spying on you,
then ban it from BEYOND 50' as well as from within 50'.
If you dont want government satellites and helicopters and small drones spying on you cause it violates your privacy,
then try to get Government Aerial Spying stopped, and then there will be no small drone Government Aerial Spying because ther will be no GAS of any kind. But to cherry pick out just one variant of GAS to say is 'bad' while just allowing the other GAS is ... well thats dumb to do. Ban it all or allow it all, but its idiocy to ban just the GAS done by yellow craft, or just the GAS done from above 200' but below 1000', or just the GAS where the operator is not INSIDE the government aircraft spying on you

Kbob, if there is a large satellite up in the orbitsphere spying on you,
but you cant see or hear it,
is that a violation of Causby?
If there is same time also a lil drone spying on you, up where you cant see or hear it either,
how is that different?