TAB
Presumably, at the (AMA) club , you would have CBO exemption. But when you fly FPV elsewhere, you would not.
It seemed that you presented a case in which a court decided that hovering over a pot growers barn was a threat because the vehicle was too close, (closer than FAA guidlelines). Why wouldn't the same COURT keep me from hovering my FPV heli over the pot growers barn? IS too close for a manned vehicle the same as too close for an unmanned vehicle ? (not speaking about FAA's opinion of things or FAR's)
what does this have to do with the title of the tread, Privacy advocates and warrants for searches?
I brought up that case's details
to debunk someone alluding to that case in this privacy thread:
That case was NOT ABOUT PRIVACY but about a violation of a Title14 US law... min alt for aircraft.
So, again, the court dismissed the notion that the heli search needed a warrant,
but held that the heli was prohibited from being there by federal law (14.91.119.c).
but I will answer your question anyway,
just to stop folks from accusing me of dodging it-
Presumably, at the (AMA) club , you would have CBO exemption. But when you fly FPV elsewhere, you would not.
you need a calendar,
check when NOW is,
and when
Someday-CBOs-Might-Get-Exemption is.
14.91.119(c) is NOW.
Current US law.
period
so, without using crystal balls to look into the future,
regarding just what is happening NOW and for the paste few years,
years there have not been and is not now some alleged
CBO Exemption On AMA Fields Only from 14.91.119(c)
I gotta wonder just what you are asking.
Cause as I said, you are running wot into the
Models Exempt From All Law pretext
while faced with the inconvenience of reality being that such is not really the situation.
This is the 'secret mystery list of laws that apply'... since there is no actual list of which fed regs DO and DONT apply to MA.
So, do you want to read the carteblanc exemption Models have from law (virtually all law),
or read the cases where modeling DOES get folk in hot water,
or listen to the proud AMA'ers just make up laws
(made up laws that dont apply to AMA of course),
or just speculate and prophetize about what the laws on models will change to be in the future
Hovering on the runnway, or buzzing the field, or low roll is a fun use of a hobby toy model,
but it is in no way to be confused with 'taking off or landing', nor excused by exemptions for TO&L,
so we are back to
wondering why AMA members are so eager to apply existing FAA Min Alt laws on FPV hobby UAS(MA)
when we are so entrenched in kicking those laws to the curb our own operating of UAS(MA).