when it comes to warbirds and flying characteristcs the experts always talk about an aircraft being manuverable. 2 questions for the masses, is it better to be manuverable vs acrobatic and how do determine who is more manuverble? have fun with this one and dont be haten on each other. I ask this question because I saw a documentary that more or less that a P51 Mustang was not designed to fly inverted so is that not acrobatic but manuverable? and or is manuverability measured by your contemporaies? Is the F15 manuverable compared to a mig 2 or su 27 etc......