My last 3 planes have all ended slightly tail heavy. Balance point is more aft than recomended in the manual. These planes have been wonderful 3d machines due to this aft CG...but all of them have had a tendency to climb sharply on inverted flight. Something I dont particularly enjoy as I have to input slight up elevator to correct which is non-conventional on inverted flights.

I know that a tail heavy plane would climb on inverted, but is my 3d plane TOO tail heavy if its climbing? My question is: Is my 3d setup incorrect? Are we supposed to keep CG such that inverted flights need just a touch of down even if we are flying on a 3d setup? To go one step too far, do the TOC 3d guys find their planes climbing on inverted flight...considering that they are setup for extreme performance? Or do they keep it balanced forward enough such that inverted flight is conventional and flies straight and level with a touch of down elevator and yet plane is capable of great 3d.

I guess the answer to this may boil down to persoanl preference, but is there a right or wrong to it?

I may have repeated my point...but I hope its clear.

Thanks,
Anurag