RCU Forums - View Single Post - AMA emails on Drones/Right to Fly
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2013 | 02:10 PM
  #64  
HoundDog's Avatar
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Default RE: AMA emails on Drones/Right to Fly


ORIGINAL: Hossfly


ORIGINAL: eddieC

Getting off-topic, guys.
Yeah, but it's good "Off Topic". OTOH, finding myself in strong agreement with LCS and SP is kinda demoralizing.

One day, a couple years ago, I watched a visiting RCer launch one of those multimotor helocopter "thinges" and let it disappear into the complete overcast clouds for a while, then return right back to him.

Absolutely amazing. However as our field is about 15 miles from Houston's Bush IC Airport, a major airport, and there are times when airliners are turning from a long downwind to to intercept the ILS final to land (still some 3-4000 ft. above ground level) I do wonder that when IFR conditions exist and one is launched into the clouds on any possible flight path of IFR aircraft by folks that are unlearned about 1:1 scale aviation, be it traffic pattern Approach/Take-Off, or enroute IFR aircraft that get IFR clearances point to point be they low minimum altitude or climbing to VFR on Top (BTDT) One airliner or business jet etc. lost by someone playing with a drone RC just seems to me that it isn't worth it except to those mfgers. and/or importers that simply are after sales.
It's like cell phones. The majority just has to have the latest gadget. I used a TRAC phone for years. Then comes a new thing and then better and better. Wife needs an upgrade, but we got I-Phones for 99 cents vice multi dollars as all were trading in the I-4 for I-5. (I think that is the proper names) Far more phone than I need when about all I use it for is to say "I'm off the flying field home - be home in 20 minutes."

Now as to OFF TOPIC: Folks posting here are a bit more learned in the overall RC Spectrum than those in "Walsmart", Toys are US, etc. Is it not RC when we get into discussions about what is happening that could definitely effect our entire sport in numerous different ways, especially the use of "toys", new gadgets, and/or the latest fun things being promoted by importers and such?
Again there are inputs here that make me question my own stance concerning drones. Certainly RCU needs to control inputs as well as we ourselves should honor that control. OTOH just what is and/or is not Off Topic when there is so much to be learned with these discussion, especially using examples of how our society operates?

P.S. I do not personally fear a drone over or beside my home, garage, barn or property. I can easily handle that sort of invasion, and I rather think I would enjoy the opportunity.
<span style="font-family: Courier New;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Just a quick count of the IFR published Approaches in to</span></span> Bush International (IAH) there 38 differant approaches into the 3 E/W and and 2 NW/SE runways. how low Planes come to the ground and where depends a lot on the published vectoring altitude for a particular airport. For example IAH RW 27 Threashold height is <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">80'</span>MSL and the FAF (final Aproach Fis) altitude is <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">1500'</span> MSL and 6.1 NM fron the end of the runway so ineffect directly East of the center of the field air craft can be anyware fron <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">200</span>' AGL for an ILS or <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">474</span>' AGL on a Localizer approach.
Here are two URL If U are interested in studing Instrument approaches:

http://www.fltplan.com/AwListAppPlates.exe?a=1

and to listen to the Tower and Aproach Control for hundereds of air ports on the Net.
http://www.liveatc.net/ <span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);">&lt;- enter an airport 3 letter ID and follow the instructions .... </span>