RCU Forums - View Single Post - Sweepback = Dihedral Effect?
View Single Post
Old 01-13-2003 | 01:28 AM
  #1  
MJohnny78
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kill Devil Hills, NC
Default Sweepback = Dihedral Effect?

Back in the early 50's I read in some mag that about 5 deg.'s of <u>sweepback</u> is equivalent to 1 deg. of <u>dihedral</u>. This is why sweptback jets don't need dihedral, and why some with <u>extreme</u> sweepback actually have <u>NEGATIVE</u> dihedral (or "anhedral", with wings that slope downward).

What about this, Aeronautical Engineers, do you agree, and if so, could you provide the EXACT no. of degrees of sweepback in my stated "formula" above?

FOR NON-BELIEVERS: Imagine a sweptback jet "falling off" to the left - the airstream does little for the <u>right</u> wing panel as it is somewhat in the "shadow" of the fuselage - the <u>left</u> wing panel, however, is highly affected since the plane is "FALLING" somewhat in THAT DIRECTION - the result is that the <u>left</u> panel is generating MORE LIFT now than the other one, tending to raise the left side again ---- THE SAME EFFECT AS <u>DIHEDRAL</u>.

Everyone agree?