Hi Joe,
You are correct to put this in this discussion. Have no fear of making this point as this is very appropriate to this topic.
I was going to do so in another recent thread relating to 'weight' and possible competitive advantage.
You should elaborate some more to help with understanding the relevance.
I will add some ;

This should be considered first ; P=mv. ( P being momentum)

A lot of us increase velocity (v) in wind - actually we are increasing momentum.
Your suggestion of adding weight (should this be at the wing tips ?? ) does the same thing.
Doing both will max,, the effect. Because one is multiplied by the other the increase in P is significant if either, and much more if both, are increased.

Getting to your F=ma ; Mass (m) here is dependant on or a consequence of m in P=mv.
Keeping this in lay-man's terms you are really talking about 'inertia' ; ' the measure of a body's resistance to changes in velocity or state of motion '.

However there are also aero solutions and if we were to take inspiration from the real gurus of aero , the F1 guys like Adrian Newey, we might really find a solution set that works well.
We don't really experiment all that much with this stuff and we should.
There is likely to be a 'magic' combination of physical (shape, volume and mass) and aero (devices, up-grades, band aids etc - be they fences ,sfg's, tiplets, winglets, turbulators etc) yet to be discovered.
Interesting topic well worth pursuing.

Brian