RCU Forums - View Single Post - 3D Airframes
Thread: 3D Airframes
View Single Post
Old 08-25-2013 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
fasteststang
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Spring Creek, NV
Default 3D Airframes

I'm wondering what the performance differences are between the airframes that are commonly used for 3D flying. Some have straight leading edges while others have straight trailing edges, while others have both tapered. How do these wing configurations (as well as other differences like the Cap 232's shorter elevator moment) affect certain 3D maneuvers.

Someone looking to get into 3D flying can be very overwhelmed by the number of different "3D" airframes. I know performances are dictated by wing loading, cg, thrust to weight ratio, etc, etc, etc.... My inquiry is more the theory of different configurations. Some of the airframes I would like to see compared are Yak 54 & 55, Extra 260 & 300, Edge 540, AJ Slick, Giles 202, MX-2, Cap 232, and any other pertinent airframes.

Thanks in advance for any and all contributions to this thread.