There is a RCU Magazine review by Nathan Matt (Plane Insane) of the Tracker II containing the following statement:

"Functionality is as good as any other 8 Channel radio on the market today."


There is also a thread entitled THERE IS A TRACKER II containing hundreds of posts, many many of which concern the failure of this transmitter to provide even basic working mixes contained in other 8-channel radios. There is also a very long thread in E-Zone that addresses many of these same shortcoming of the Tracker II. The RCM Magazine review, however, makes no mention whatsoever of any of the Tracker II failures in either thread.

Guess this shows the value of RCU Magazine reviews.

Mr. Matt, care to respond to the posts in the thread THERE IS A TRACKER II by explaning to them how the "Functionality is as good as any other 8 Channel radio on the market today." ?