RCU Forums - View Single Post - Towards Improving RC Tank IR battles: An Easy, Reversible Simple Process
Old 12-11-2013, 09:57 PM
  #1  
reyemmanuel
Senior Member
 
reyemmanuel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Towards Improving RC Tank IR battles: An Easy, Reversible Simple Process

Hello RC tankers, modellers, armour nuts


I'm embarking on doing some systematic tests for later publication to the wider RC tank community towards improving the RC tank IR battle. A work in progress which you and you clubs may experiment on as well.


This is a three-point agenda, a balance of simplicity and realism whilst generating new interests and overall resurgence/revival of IR battling worldwide (through tactical gameplay).


A. Survivability= modelled via the IR receiver configuration
*(Tamiya, Impact, Heng Long IR receivers all have a single prism, fins and a single IR sensor)


WWII Category ___________Post War Category _____________Receiver Configuration_________________IR Penetrable range, m__________________Scaled up Pen Range, m
Light ___________________M41, Leo1________________________no fins________________________________40__________________________________ 600
Medium__________________T55_______________________ _____stock, as is____________________________30__________________________________ 480
Heavy ___________________MBT____________________________no fins and no prism_____________________(Tamiya) 3; (Impact) 5_________________ 80
__________________________________________________ ______no fins, with prism_________________________2.5_______________________________40




B. Firepower = All tanks set to Light Configuration (Max Hit: 3; Reload time, s: 3)
Normalised due to IR range; normalisation accounts for gunnery, optical technology, sit awareness spanning WWII to MBT gen
* this can be further explored if this becomes widely accepted thorough the addition of 500 ohm pot between IR emitter LED and MFU (as per Dan Crowley's design). for now, the focus is simplicity


C. Mobility = SUSTAINED CROSS-COUNTRY MOBILITY not On-road speed
Can be done either digitallly (Transmitter endpoints), mechanically (DropDownGears) or physically (rubber band, blu tac to Heng Long transmitter)
*takes into consideration the specific power (hp per ton) suspension and track width, rubber pads, etc.

WW II Category:
Light < 30 kph
Med < 20 kph
Hvy < 10 kph

Post War Category:
M41, Leo1, T55 < 40 kph
MBTs < 50 kph




Will be publishing test results here and be updated as we go.


cheers,Rey

Last edited by reyemmanuel; 12-12-2013 at 05:39 AM.